Introduction

0:00 So perhaps looking at the next 10 to 15 years and particularly focusing on artificial intelligence and the impact that that may have on things and also looking at the coming of kind of neuroscience and the way that may affect or otherwise the the training and the value of particular trainings as well. So just to read you the question, this person of course is thinking of starting training or is starting training. So what they've said is moving over from an industry that has become dominated by AI and having a lot of working years left.

0:21 One of my concerns is for longevity of a profession. A friend of mine who recently finished a therapy adjacent masters thinks that as mental health becomes increasingly integrated into the health system, less scientific qualifications like a diploma may hold less long-term value in terms of professional recognition or legal right to practice. As with all of these subjects, I would love to hear what you have to say. Whether that's about, you know, the training, neuroscience, what do you think of the quality of your diploma or your training?

1:09 What could be in it more? what could be in it less. I've qualified in 2012, so it's been a long time since I've been in training. And I do know that my training incorporates more kind of trauma training, which is where a lot of this neuroscience and more physiology and more kind of medical side of training has has come in. So, I know for a fact that things have changed since I did my training, but I would love to hear from you what you think, how how it's incorporated into your training, whether it could be more, whether it could be less, and of course about the things that I'm saying too.

1:33 Similarly with AI and when I talk about that, I'm going to be talking just from my experience. But again, I would love to hear what you have to say about it. If you agree with