Course overview
Lesson 5 of 8 · 3 promptsAI for Treasury Analysts
LESSON 05 OF 8

Investment Analysis

3 prompts for Treasury Analysts

Prompts for Treasury Analysts: copy one, fill it in, paste it into your AI.

Track progress as a member

In this lesson

  1. 01Compare Short-Term Investment OptionsUse this when you have several short-term investment choices and need a side-by-side summary of yield, risk, and liquidity.
  2. 02Explain Investment Policy RulesUse this when you need to check what your investment policy allows before placing funds.
  3. 03Draft an Investment Recommendation MemoUse this when you need to write a short recommendation for placing excess cash, with the reasoning spelled out.
1Copy the promptClick Copy on the prompt you need.
2Paste it into your AIChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Copilot.
3Fill in the {{brackets}}Your own details, or let the AI ask you.
4Follow up and checkUse the follow-ups, then check the facts.
01

Compare Short-Term Investment Options

Use this when you have several short-term investment choices and need a side-by-side summary of yield, risk, and liquidity.

Prompt

Role You support a corporate treasury team by turning raw investment details into a clear side-by-side comparison of short-term options, optimising for accurate yield, risk and liquidity trade-offs rather than recommendations.

Context you provide

  • {{investment_options}} - names of the instruments or counterparties being compared
  • {{investment_horizon}} - how long cash can be committed, e.g. 30, 90 or 180 days
  • {{cash_amount}} - amount available to invest and any minimum lot sizes
  • {{yield_details}} - quoted rates, discount rates or expected returns per option
  • {{risk_notes}} - credit quality, counterparty, duration or market risk notes
  • {{liquidity_needs}} - access requirements, notice periods, settlement timing
  • {{policy_constraints}} - internal limits, approved lists or concentration caps
  • {{currency_and_jurisdiction}} - currency, tax and regulatory context

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm the comparison basis (horizon, currency, gross or net yield) before analysing.
  2. Normalise each option's yield to a comparable annualised basis and show the calculation basis used.
  3. Score each option on yield, credit and market risk, and liquidity, using a simple high, medium, low scale.
  4. Note concentration, counterparty and settlement risks that affect the decision.
  5. Highlight where an option breaches or sits close to a stated policy limit.
  6. State what additional information would materially change the ranking.

Output format A markdown table with one row per option and columns for yield basis, risk, liquidity, policy fit and notes. Follow with a short bullet list of key trade-offs and open questions. Keep it under 500 words, neutral tone, no product recommendations.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent yields, credit ratings, policy limits or regulatory rules; use only supplied figures and mark gaps as unknown.
  • Flag every assumption and state when the user must verify terms with the counterparty, their investment policy or a licensed adviser.
  • Do not recommend a specific instrument; present trade-offs only.

Example Options: 30-day bank deposit, money market fund, T-bill ladder; horizon 90 days; amount 5,000,000 USD; policy cap 25% per counterparty.

Open as its own page

02

Explain Investment Policy Rules

Use this when you need to check what your investment policy allows before placing funds.

Prompt

Role You are a treasury investment policy reviewer. You explain, in plain language, which policy rules apply to a proposed placement and what must be confirmed before funds move, optimising for accurate, clause-referenced guidance the analyst can act on.

Context you provide

  • {{policy_document}}: the investment policy text or the sections covering eligible instruments, limits and approvals
  • {{proposed_trade}}: instrument, issuer, amount, currency, tenor and settlement date you intend to place
  • {{current_portfolio}}: existing holdings, cash position and known upcoming outflows
  • {{counterparty_details}}: issuer or counterparty name, rating source and exposure already held
  • {{approval_route}}: who signs off and any delegated limits already agreed
  • {{open_question}}: the specific rule you are unsure about

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then restate the proposed placement in one sentence.
  2. Identify every policy clause that applies: eligible instruments, credit quality, maturity, concentration, liquidity, currency and counterparty limits.
  3. For each clause, summarise the rule and state whether the trade complies, breaches it, or needs a check.
  4. Flag any rule that depends on a figure you were not given, and say exactly what to confirm.
  5. List the approvals and documentation required before execution, in order.
  6. Note where the policy is silent and a decision must be escalated rather than assumed.

Output format A short summary table with columns: rule, source clause, status, action. Then bullet lists for approvals and open questions. Plain business English, no legal advice, no invented limits.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent policy limits, ratings, clause numbers or regulatory references. If the policy text is missing, say so and stop.
  • Mark every assumption clearly and flag when the policy owner, a regulator or the board must be consulted.
  • Do not approve a trade; only explain the rules and the checks required.

Example Policy allows A-rated bank deposits only, 20% issuer cap, 90-day maximum; proposed EUR 5m six-month deposit with 18% already at that bank.

Open as its own page

03

Draft an Investment Recommendation Memo

Use this when you need to write a short recommendation for placing excess cash, with the reasoning spelled out.

Prompt

Role: You are a treasury analyst supporting a corporate treasury team. You optimise for a clear, defensible recommendation that a treasurer can approve or challenge, not a sales pitch.

Context you provide

  • {{excess_cash_amount}}: amount available to invest, with currency
  • {{investment_horizon}}: how long the cash can stay invested
  • {{liquidity_needs}}: known outflows and their timing
  • {{candidate_options}}: instruments or accounts under consideration
  • {{risk_constraints}}: policy limits, credit quality, concentration rules
  • {{return_assumptions}}: yields or rates you have been quoted
  • {{counterparty_details}}: issuer or bank names and any rating information you hold
  • {{reporting_requirements}}: who receives this and in what format

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then wait.
  2. Restate the cash objective: safety, liquidity, then yield, unless the user sets a different priority.
  3. Compare each candidate option against horizon, liquidity needs, and risk constraints in a short table.
  4. Recommend one option and state the trade-offs accepted.
  5. List the conditions that would change the recommendation.
  6. Note what must be confirmed before execution.

Output format: One page maximum. Heading, recommendation line, comparison table, reasoning in three to five sentences, conditions, and a confirmation checklist. Plain business English. No marketing language, no invented yields.

Guardrails

  • Use only the figures and rates supplied; never estimate a yield, rating, or fee.
  • Flag every assumption explicitly.
  • Tell the user to confirm instrument terms, counterparty limits, and any local regulatory or accounting treatment with the appropriate licensed professional or the issuer's documentation before dealing.

Example: {{excess_cash_amount}}: USD 4,000,000; {{investment_horizon}}: 90 days; {{candidate_options}}: money market fund, 3-month term deposit, short-dated government bills.

Open as its own page