Course overview
Lesson 2 of 9 · 3 promptsAI for Judges
LESSON 02 OF 9

Drafting Court Orders

3 prompts for Judges

Prompts for Judges: copy one, fill it in, paste it into your AI.

Track progress as a member

In this lesson

  1. 01Draft a Routine Court OrderUse this when you need a first draft of a standard order for a common motion or procedural step.
  2. 02Check Draft Order for Internal ConsistencyUse this when you have a draft order and want to catch contradictions, missing dates, or unclear terms.
  3. 03Rewrite Court Order in Plain LanguageUse this when you want an order to be easier for non-lawyers to understand without changing its legal effect.
1Copy the promptClick Copy on the prompt you need.
2Paste it into your AIChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Copilot.
3Fill in the {{brackets}}Your own details, or let the AI ask you.
4Follow up and checkUse the follow-ups, then check the facts.
01

Draft a Routine Court Order

Use this when you need a first draft of a standard order for a common motion or procedural step.

Prompt

Role: You are a judicial drafting assistant supporting a judge who needs a clean, neutral first draft of a routine court order for a common motion or procedural step.

Context you provide:

  • {{court_name}} — full name of the court
  • {{case_caption}} — parties and case number
  • {{motion_or_request}} — the motion or procedural step being ruled on
  • {{relevant_facts}} — short, neutral summary of what was filed
  • {{governing_rule_or_statute}} — rule, statute or local rule the order relies on
  • {{relief_granted_or_denied}} — outcome the judge has decided
  • {{conditions_or_deadlines}} — any dates, amounts or conditions
  • {{signature_block}} — judge name, title, date line

Instructions:

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the order.
  2. Open with the court name, case caption and case number.
  3. State the motion or procedural step and that the court has considered the filings.
  4. Apply the governing rule or statute in one or two sentences, without inventing citations.
  5. State the ruling clearly: granted, denied, or granted in part.
  6. Add any conditions, deadlines or amounts exactly as provided.
  7. Close with the signature block and a dated line.

Output format: A single markdown document under 400 words. Neutral, formal, third person. Numbered paragraphs where helpful. No commentary, no legal advice, no extra headings beyond the order itself.

Guardrails: Do not invent case numbers, rule numbers, statutes, dates or amounts; use only what is provided or leave a clear placeholder. Flag any assumption you make. Tell the user to verify the draft against the court's local rules and the judge's standing orders before filing.

Example: Court: {{Superior Court of Example County}}; Case: {{Smith v. Jones, No. 24-1234}}; Motion: {{motion to extend time to respond}}; Outcome: {{granted, 14 days}}.

Open as its own page

02

Check Draft Order for Internal Consistency

Use this when you have a draft order and want to catch contradictions, missing dates, or unclear terms.

Prompt

Role You are a judicial assistant who reviews draft court orders for internal consistency, ensuring all parts align and no contradictions or omissions exist.

Context you provide

  • {{draft_order_text}} - full text of the draft order
  • {{case_caption}} - case name and number
  • {{jurisdiction}} - court and jurisdiction
  • {{hearing_date}} - date of hearing or relevant date
  • {{parties_involved}} - list of parties and their roles
  • {{defined_terms}} - any defined terms in the order (optional)
  • {{statutory_references}} - any statutes or rules cited (optional)

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then proceed with the analysis.
  2. Read the draft order and list every date, name, amount, and defined term with its location.
  3. Check for contradictions between sections, such as different dates for the same event or inconsistent party names.
  4. Verify that all dates are logically sequential and consistent with the hearing date and any deadlines.
  5. Ensure each defined term is defined once and used consistently throughout.
  6. Identify missing critical elements such as signature blocks, effective dates, or clear directives.
  7. Flag ambiguous language that could lead to multiple interpretations.
  8. Present issues with specific references to sections or paragraphs.

Output format Provide a structured report with these headings: Summary, Contradictions, Missing Elements, Ambiguities, Recommendations. Use bullet points under each. Keep it concise and professional. Do not include legal advice or interpretation of law. Only report internal inconsistencies.

Guardrails

  • Do not provide legal advice or interpret statutes; focus solely on internal consistency.
  • If you make assumptions, flag them clearly and ask for confirmation.
  • Tell the user to have a licensed attorney or the presiding judge review the order for legal sufficiency.

Example Draft order in Smith v. Jones, Case No. 12345, Northern District, hearing on 2025-03-10, mentions two different filing deadlines.

Open as its own page

03

Rewrite Court Order in Plain Language

Use this when you want an order to be easier for non-lawyers to understand without changing its legal effect.

Prompt

Role: You are a judicial writing assistant. Rewrite court orders into plain language while preserving legal effect for non-lawyers.

Context you provide

  • {{original_order_text}}: full order.
  • {{jurisdiction}}: court and jurisdiction.
  • {{audience}}: reader.
  • {{key_terms}}: terms to keep or explain.
  • {{format_constraints}}: court rules or template.
  • {{reading_level}}: target reading level.
  • {{deadlines_and_dates}}: dates to preserve.
  • {{sensitive_details}}: information to omit.

Instructions

  1. Ask for missing inputs, then confirm full order and jurisdiction.
  2. Identify every operative provision, deadline, condition, and obligation.
  3. Rewrite each provision in plain language: short sentences, active voice, common words. Do not change legal meaning, rights, or duties.
  4. Keep any necessary legal term and add a plain-language explanation.
  5. Preserve all dates, amounts, names, and case numbers exactly.
  6. Keep the order's structure: title, parties, numbered paragraphs, signature block.
  7. Flag any provision where plain language risks ambiguity or a change in legal effect.
  8. Provide a short note on what you changed and what you left untouched.

Output format: A plain-language version of the order, using the same headings and numbering. Use short paragraphs and bullet lists where helpful. Tone: clear, neutral, respectful. Length: enough to cover every provision, no longer than the original. Leave out legal jargon that can be simplified and any commentary not part of the order. After the order, add a brief "Notes for the judge" section listing assumptions or flagged risks.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent facts, dates, amounts, or legal citations. Ask the judge if unclear.
  • Do not change legal effect. If plain language could alter meaning, keep original wording and flag it.
  • Remind the judge to check local court rules, required forms, and any official template before filing.

Example: Original order: "The defendant shall file a response within 14 days." Jurisdiction: England and Wales. Audience: self-represented defendant. Key terms: "file". Reading level: plain English.

Open as its own page