Employee Automates 60% of Work, Fears Telling Manager
A professional has automated a major business process affecting 100 people, cutting manual work by 60 percent, but hesitates to disclose the efficiency gain to their manager. The dilemma reveals a growing tension in workplaces where AI-driven productivity improvements clash with job security concerns.
The employee used VBA code with AI assistance to automate nearly three-quarters of a workflow. The solution has been tested and runs without errors.
Their reluctance stems from two concerns: the team could face increased workloads once the automation becomes known, and personal recognition alone may not justify the disclosure. There's no guarantee the efficiency gain translates to career advancement.
What Others Are Saying
Online responses to the situation ranged from cautionary to cautious. Some advised keeping the efficiency gains private and using the freed-up time for other work. Others shared cautionary tales from larger companies where extensive automation led to layoffs rather than rewards.
One user described a scenario where a long-serving employee was let go after introducing significant process improvements, as the company sought cost cuts and workforce reductions.
The Broader Workplace Question
The situation underscores a real tension in modern work. AI and automation enable substantial productivity gains, yet workers worry about job security, fair recognition, and how saved time will be redistributed.
For managers, this dynamic presents a challenge: how to foster a culture where employees feel safe reporting efficiency improvements without fearing negative consequences.
Understanding AI Agents & Automation and AI for Management can help leaders navigate these conversations effectively and build trust around automation initiatives.
Your membership also unlocks:
