The Florida Board of Education approved rules Wednesday governing artificial intelligence use in K-12 public schools and state colleges, establishing parental consent requirements and strict data privacy protections. The policies, passed at a meeting at Polk State College in Winter Haven, mark one of the most detailed state-level AI frameworks for education in the country.
Education Commissioner Henry Mack said the rules aim for a middle path. "We are exercising the virtue of prudence here," Mack said. "We are neither going to one extreme, i.e. banning AI, nor are we going to the other extreme, which is unfettered access, so there's real value in what we're presenting today."
Parental consent and instructional alternatives
Under the new K-12 rules, districts must notify parents before a student uses an AI product and obtain parental consent. If a parent declines, the district must offer an alternative, non-AI instructional tool of similar quality. School districts have until July 1, 2027, to finalize their policies for the 2027-2028 school year.
For Florida's 28 state colleges, the board now requires institutions to adopt AI policies that prohibit students from using AI on graded assignments unless the instructor explicitly permits it. The rules also mandate that AI use in grades PreK-5 undergo an additional review before approval.
Data privacy and student protections
The policies place significant guardrails around student data. Vendors cannot sell, monetize, or commercially exploit student data to train AI models. Districts must prioritize vendors that keep student data within the United States. The rules also ban AI tools from subjecting students to undisclosed behavior monitoring, social scoring, or psychological profiling.
Additional restrictions prohibit AI instructional tools from being used to address a student's social or emotional needs or from simulating an emotional relationship with a student. AI products with anthropomorphic design features intended to encourage interaction are also barred. Teachers and administrators must complete training on AI risks, limitations, safety, and compliance, and students cannot use AI unsupervised. School personnel must be able to immediately suspend or disable an AI product without vendor assistance.
A measured approach to classroom AI
Mack described AI as a supplement to instruction, not a replacement. "AI is an enhancement. It's a supplement. It doesn't supplant. It's complimentary," he said. "The rules before you today elevate that in a very nuanced way. It's a difficult conversation."
Districts will also need to amend their internet safety regulations to include AI use. The framework reflects a deliberate effort to integrate the technology while maintaining human oversight at every level of instruction.
Why this matters for educators
For teachers and school leaders, these rules create a compliance timeline that will shape curriculum planning for the next two academic years. The parental consent requirement means districts must develop clear communication processes, and the training mandate will require professional development on AI tools. Administrators who want to get ahead of the July 2027 deadline can explore structured learning paths like AI for Teachers Courses to understand classroom applications, or AI for School Principals for guidance on policy implementation and staff training.
Your membership also unlocks:
