Complete AI Training
Start for Free

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

AI news ·

Frontiers launches AI guidance for researchers, editors and reviewers

Frontiers released AI guidelines for researchers, editors, and reviewers on April 13, 2026, and urged policymakers to update frameworks that lag behind AI's fast development.

On April 13, 2026, publisher Frontiers released a set of practical AI guidelines aimed at researchers, editors, and reviewers, while also calling for broader policy changes to keep pace with the technology's role in scientific work. The move comes as AI tools become more common in manuscript preparation, peer review, and editorial decision-making, raising questions about transparency, bias, and accountability.

What the guidance addresses

Although full details of the guidance were not immediately available, the announcement described it as "unique" and focused on practical, day-to-day use of AI in the research workflow. The guidelines are expected to cover how researchers can responsibly use AI for literature reviews, data analysis, and writing, as well as how editors and reviewers should evaluate AI-assisted submissions. As publishers like Frontiers release guidance, many researchers are also turning to AI Research Courses to understand the tools available.

Policy evolution on the agenda

Frontiers also used the launch to urge policymakers and research institutions to update their frameworks. The publisher said that existing policies often lag behind the fast development of AI tools, creating uncertainty for researchers and publishers alike. The call for policy evolution signals a push for clearer standards around authorship, data integrity, and the disclosure of AI use.

Why this matters for science and research professionals

For working scientists, editors, and reviewers, the absence of clear AI guidelines can lead to inconsistent practices and ethical blind spots. With AI becoming a routine part of research, having a practical reference helps professionals navigate questions about what is acceptable and what requires disclosure. Those looking to build their skills can also explore dedicated AI for Science & Research training to stay current with best practices.

Share