New York City public schools will ban generative AI for students through eighth grade this fall, Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced Wednesday. The policy, which applies to the nation's largest school district, also restricts screen time for the youngest students and launches limited AI pilot programs in high schools - but both parent advocates and the city's teachers union say the rules leave too many questions unanswered.
"It is the most comprehensive of its kind anywhere in the country," Mamdani said at a news conference at the Brooklyn STEAM Center. "And it begins with a simple principle: Children need their teachers and human connection in order to learn and in order to grow."
The regulations ban generative AI for students in 2-K through eighth grade for at least the upcoming school year, while prohibiting students in 2-K through second grade from using individual devices such as Chromebooks in the classroom. The policy also recommends screen time limits for older grades. AI "companion" chatbots are banned across all grade levels, and the school system will disable AI components in 38 previously approved programs that no longer meet the new standards.
High school pilots and AI literacy modules
While the ban covers younger grades, the policy opens the door to more AI use for older students. Up to 50,000 high school students will participate in five pilot programs using pre-approved AI software, including Quill for reading support, Edia for math coaching, and Intel AI-Ready Schools for semester-long projects. Use is capped at 45 minutes per week under direct teacher supervision.
Principals must apply for the pilots, which are limited to five classes per school. All older students will also take 45-minute AI literacy trainings twice per year covering "what AI is and is not, as well as AI-related bias, risks, ethical considerations and impacts on careers and future skills." Students in the pilot programs must complete a longer course of 12 to 15 hours.
Pushback from parents and the teachers union
The AI Moratorium Coalition, a group of mostly parents who pushed for a two-year moratorium, called the policy a step forward but warned that exemptions could endanger students. Liat Olenick, a pre-K parent and coalition member, said: "If we're honest, there's a lot of unanswered questions. Too many exceptions. But kindergartners will not be talking to AI chatbots this fall - and that is huge progress."
Yelani Joseph, a rising junior at Urban Assembly Institute of Math and Science for Young Women, criticized the decision to exempt high schools. "We can't just stop at middle school," she said. "High school students deserve more than to simply be the subjects of these experiments."
United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew said the screen-time policy "makes sense," but the AI rules "leave many questions unanswered" because the school system has not explained how it will ensure purchased products follow the new rules. "If we are going to be serious, let's start at the source," Mulgrew said, "rather than expect school communities or individual educators to figure out after the fact if what their school uses fits the new policy."
School officials said the policy is not intended to be punitive for students, and Mamdani offered few enforcement details beyond saying he has "trust" in teachers, principals, and district superintendents. The policy may be extended or amended after next school year. The first day of school is September 10.
Why this matters for education and government professionals
New York City's approach will likely become a reference point for districts nationwide weighing AI restrictions. The tension between the ban for younger grades and the pilot programs for high schoolers mirrors a broader debate: how to protect students while preparing them for a workforce that increasingly demands AI skills. Richard Buery, Jr., CEO of anti-poverty organization Robin Hood, captured that friction, saying: "In an understandable effort to protect students, I fear we're rejecting uses that could help them." For school leaders and policymakers, the unanswered questions around procurement and enforcement flagged by the UFT point to the implementation challenges that will follow any AI policy - whether restrictive or permissive. School leaders navigating these decisions can explore the AI Learning Path for School Principals, while teachers adapting to new classroom rules may benefit from the AI Learning Path for Teachers.
Your membership also unlocks:
