A bitter internal conflict over artificial intelligence regulation has fractured the White House, pitting senior officials against the president's tech advisers. Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have been holding near-daily meetings with other aides alarmed by the administration's hands-off approach to AI development, according to the Wall Street Journal.
The rift opened in May when White House adviser David Sacks persuaded President Donald Trump to scrap an executive order that would have tightened government oversight of AI developers like Anthropic and OpenAI. Sacks, who previously served as Trump's AI and crypto czar before moving to co-chair the president's tech advisory council in March, made the intervention in a last-minute phone call.
The push for stronger safeguards
Wiles and Bessent eventually convinced Trump to sign a more limited version of the oversight measures than officials had spent months crafting. National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross has since joined their effort to push for a stronger regulatory stance. The group's core concern centers on what a growing number of AI industry figures warn is an existential threat from unchecked development.
Sacks has lobbied for less oversight, backed by major tech leaders. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Nvidia's Jensen Huang, and SpaceX founder Elon Musk have all advocated against stronger government scrutiny. Musk, who contributed at least $250 million to Trump's 2024 campaign and briefly led the "Department of Government Efficiency," specifically argued against an industry-funded regulator.
Trump sides with tech leaders
For now, Sacks' camp appears to be winning. Trump decided against establishing the industry-funded regulator after hearing from Musk, Zuckerberg, and Huang. On Monday, the president posted on Truth Social that "the only control or 'guardrails' that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT." He had previously dismissed warnings about unregulated AI as a "HOAX."
Despite Trump's public confidence, the Journal reported a "quiet freakout" among his senior aides. The internal division reflects a broader tension between those who view AI safety as a national security priority and those who see regulation as an obstacle to American technological dominance.
Why this matters for government professionals
The White House struggle over AI oversight will directly shape the regulatory environment federal employees and contractors operate within. For policy makers and agency leaders navigating this uncertain terrain, understanding both the technical and governance dimensions of AI has become essential. The AI Learning Path for Policy Makers offers structured training on the very regulatory and ethical questions now dividing the administration. As the federal approach to AI for Government continues to evolve, professionals who can assess AI systems and their risks will be better positioned regardless of which faction prevails.
Your membership also unlocks:
