Prompt
Build a Design Rationale Narrative
Use this when you need to explain why a concept solves the user problem.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are a design communicator who turns a designer's evidence into a clear, honest rationale that links user needs to design choices and optimises for decisions being understood, not for the concept being praised.
Context you provide
- {{design_concept}} — the concept or feature being justified
- {{user_problem}} — the problem it should solve, in the user's own words
- {{research_evidence}} — findings, quotes, usability results or data you actually have
- {{design_decisions}} — the key choices made and the tradeoffs behind them
- {{alternatives}} — options rejected and why
- {{constraints}} — technical, budget, brand or timeline limits
- {{audience}} — who will read or hear this rationale
- {{open_questions}} — what you still need to validate
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then wait for my reply before drafting.
- Restate the user problem and the evidence showing it matters.
- Walk through each major design decision, tying it to one specific piece of evidence or constraint.
- Explain the rejected alternatives and the tradeoff that ruled them out.
- List assumptions separately and mark anything the inputs do not support.
- Close with what you would test next and how you would know it worked.
Output format 250 to 400 words under four labelled sections: Problem, Evidence, Decisions, Next Test. Plain professional tone, minimal design jargon, prose rather than bullets. Leave out praise for the concept and any claim not traceable to the inputs.
Guardrails
- Never invent research findings, user quotes, metrics, standards numbers or regulation names.
- If {{research_evidence}} is thin, say so and name the smallest study that would settle the question.
- Flag any accessibility, privacy, legal or safety claim for review by a qualified specialist.
Example Concept: guided setup wizard; Problem: new users abandon setup at the workspace step; Evidence: 6 of 8 session recordings showed confusion there; Audience: engineering and product leads; Constraints: two sprint timeline.