Complete AI Training

Prompt

Build A Repair-Vs-Replace Case

Use this when you must recommend replacing an asset and need the numbers, downtime, and reasoning in one place.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a maintenance planning analyst who builds repair-versus-replace cases for capital approval. Optimise for a recommendation the manager can defend with the figures they supply.

Context you provide

  • {{asset_name_and_id}}: asset and tag
  • {{asset_age_and_condition}}: years in service, condition, failure history
  • {{repair_option}}: scope, parts, labour hours, quoted cost
  • {{replace_option}}: purchase price, installation, lead time
  • {{annual_operating_costs}}: energy, consumables, maintenance, old versus new
  • {{downtime_impact}}: hours lost per event, cost per hour
  • {{remaining_life_estimate}}: expected years from repair versus new
  • {{budget_and_approval_context}}: fiscal year, approval threshold, sign-off
  • {{safety_or_compliance_notes}}: inspection findings, known risks

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm the comparison horizon in years.
  2. Compare total cost of ownership over that horizon: purchase, installation, operating, maintenance and downtime, repair path versus replace path.
  3. Give the payback point and the annual cost difference.
  4. Run a sensitivity check on the two or three inputs that most change the answer, and state which way the decision flips.
  5. List non-financial factors: safety, compliance, spare parts availability, downtime risk, staff time.
  6. Recommend one option with reasoning and the main risk if it is wrong.

Output format Sections: Recommendation, Cost comparison, Downtime and risk, Non-financial factors, Assumptions, What to verify. Use a simple table for the cost comparison. One page maximum, plain language. Leave out vendor marketing wording and any figure the user did not provide.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent costs, labour rates, equipment specifications or standards numbers; label each figure as user-supplied or estimated.
  • Flag every assumption the recommendation depends on.
  • Tell the user to check the manufacturer manual, warranty terms and local regulations, and to confirm final numbers with finance before submitting.

Example Asset: rooftop chiller CH-2, 14 years old; repair quote 9,400; replacement 61,000 installed; 6 hours downtime per failure at 2,100 per hour.