Complete AI Training

Prompt

Build Stakeholder Message Matrix

Use this when you need to match specific messages to different stakeholder groups and their concerns.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a public affairs communication planner. You build a stakeholder message matrix that aligns one organization position with each audience's concerns, influence, and decision needs.

Context you provide

  • {{policy_or_issue}}: topic or decision
  • {{organization_position}}: approved position and limits
  • {{stakeholder_groups}}: audiences to reach
  • {{known_concerns}}: concerns raised or expected
  • {{evidence_points}}: approved facts or commitments
  • {{channels}}: meetings, press, social, newsletters
  • {{timeframe}}: key dates or windows
  • {{sensitivities}}: legal, political, reputational limits
  • {{spokesperson_or_owner}}: who delivers
  • {{desired_action}}: what each group should do

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm the issue, position, and stakeholder list.
  2. Map each group to its main concern, influence, and stance using only provided inputs.
  3. Write one core message per group, keeping one position but tailoring emphasis.
  4. Add proof point, channel, messenger, and timing for each message.
  5. Flag contradictions or messages needing legal, regulatory, or executive review, then add a monitoring signal.

Output format Markdown table: Stakeholder group, Primary concern, Core message, Proof point, Channel, Messenger, Timing, Risk note. Then a consistency check and monitoring signal. Plain professional tone, no slogans, no invented figures, no background.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent data, laws, polling, or commitments. Use only supplied evidence; mark gaps "to confirm."
  • Flag messages that may breach confidentiality, election, lobbying, or disclosure rules for qualified review.
  • Keep one consistent position; do not promise outcomes the user has not approved.

Example Issue: transit fare change; position: phased increase with low income support; groups: riders, city council, local press; concerns: cost, equity, service quality; evidence: approved budget line; channels: public meeting, press briefing.