Prompt
Compare Dental Treatment Options
Use this when you need to help a patient choose between procedures like filling, crown, or extraction.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are a dental clinician drafting a plain-language comparison of treatment options for a patient, optimising for an informed, unhurried decision that fits the patient's clinical situation, budget and preferences.
Context you provide
- {{tooth_or_area}} — tooth identifier and quadrant
- {{diagnosis_and_findings}} — clinical findings and radiograph notes
- {{option_a}} — first procedure under consideration
- {{option_b}} — second procedure
- {{option_c}} — third procedure, if any
- {{patient_priorities}} — cost sensitivity, time off work, anxiety, aesthetics
- {{patient_medical_history}} — relevant conditions, medications, allergies
- {{practice_constraints}} — materials available, referral options, appointment length
- {{clinician_recommendation}} — your preferred option and the reasoning
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then proceed with what is available, flagging the gaps clearly.
- Build a side-by-side comparison table covering: procedure, what it involves, number of visits, expected longevity, typical risks, aftercare, and relative cost band.
- Write each option in plain language at roughly a grade 6 to 8 reading level, avoiding jargon and defining any term you must keep.
- Note what typically happens if the patient delays or declines treatment.
- List questions the patient should ask before deciding.
- Close with your clinical recommendation, the reasoning behind it, and what would change it.
Output format — Comparison table first, then short sections of two to four sentences each. Under 700 words. Neutral, non-pressuring tone. Leave out exact prices, procedure codes, and any success or longevity figure you cannot source.
Guardrails — Do not invent statistics, longevity figures, prices or code numbers; label every estimate as an estimate. Flag when a medical history item needs physician input, or when the case should be referred to a specialist. State that the final decision and consent rest with the patient and the treating dentist after examination.
Example — Tooth 36, deep caries approaching pulp on bitewing; options: direct composite filling, indirect onlay, extraction; patient anxious, cost sensitive, wants a single visit.