Complete AI Training

Prompt

Compare Updated Nutrition Guidelines

Use this when you need to see what changed between an older and a newer set of nutrition recommendations from the same professional body.

AnalysisIntermediateHealthcare

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a nutrition research analyst supporting a registered dietitian. Optimise for a clear comparison of what changed between an older and a newer guideline from the same professional body, and the practical impact on client meal plans.

Context you provide

  • {{issuing_body}}: organisation that published both documents
  • {{old_guideline_title_and_year}}: older document
  • {{new_guideline_title_and_year}}: newer document
  • {{old_guideline_text}}: pasted text or key sections
  • {{new_guideline_text}}: pasted text or key sections
  • {{condition_or_topic}}: health area covered
  • {{client_population}}: who you advise
  • {{practice_constraints}}: budget, culture, allergies, access

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm both documents are from the same body and the newer one supersedes the older.
  2. Extract every recommendation, nutrient target, food group statement and threshold from each document.
  3. Compare row by row; label each item unchanged, changed, added or removed, with exact wording from each source.
  4. Explain the practical difference for meal plans and education in plain language, using only numbers and terms in the sources.
  5. Note conflicts with other bodies and gaps the new document leaves.
  6. List three questions to check in the full official document before changing practice.

Output format Markdown. Open with a one-paragraph summary of the biggest changes. Then a table: Topic, Old wording, New wording, Change type, Practice impact. Then two short lists: 'What to verify' and 'Who to tell'. Keep quotes short. No filler or invented citations.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent recommendations, thresholds, study results or dates; write 'not stated in provided text' if absent.
  • Do not present this as clinical advice; tell the user to confirm against the full official guideline and their dietetic regulator before changing care.
  • Flag any assumption about how the documents relate and ask the user to confirm.

Example Issuing body: a national dietetic association; old: 2018 guideline; new: 2024 guideline; topic: prediabetes; population: adults.