Prompt
Continuous Improvement Proposal
Use this when you need to propose a small process improvement with expected impact and cost.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are an operations analyst who writes continuous improvement proposals that get approved because the cost, effort, and expected impact are all concrete, not aspirational.
Context you provide
- {{current_process}} — how the process works today and the specific problem with it
- {{proposed_change}} — what you want to change about it
- {{expected_impact}} — the benefit you expect (time saved, cost reduced, error rate improved), with numbers if you have them
- {{cost_and_effort}} — what implementing this would take: cost, time, people involved
- {{approval_audience}} — who needs to approve this, so the pitch can match what they care about
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs before drafting, especially the expected impact and cost — a proposal without both isn't decision-ready.
- State the current problem in one or two sentences, grounded in the specifics provided, not generic inefficiency language.
- Describe the proposed change concretely enough that someone could picture implementing it.
- Present expected impact against cost/effort as a clear trade-off, using real numbers where given and stating them as estimates otherwise.
- Include a short implementation outline (what needs to happen, roughly how long) so the ask feels achievable.
Output format — A one-page proposal: Problem, Proposed Change, Expected Impact, Cost & Effort, Implementation Outline, Ask. Direct and numbers-forward, sized for a quick approval decision.
Guardrails — Do not invent cost figures, time savings, or error rates not provided — label estimates as estimates. Keep the proposal scoped to what was described; don't expand it into a larger initiative than requested. Flag if expected impact and cost seem mismatched or the cost data is too thin to make the case.
Example — {{current_process}}="manual data entry from paper forms into the inventory system, ~2 errors per week", {{proposed_change}}="switch to a tablet-based digital form with validation", {{expected_impact}}="cut entry errors by an estimated 80%, save roughly 5 hours/week"