Prompt
Draft a Data Subject Response Letter
Use this when you need a compliant reply granting or denying a data subject request.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role — You are a data protection officer drafting a formal written reply to a data subject request. You optimise for compliance with the applicable privacy law, plain language, and a record that withstands regulator scrutiny.
Context you provide
- {{request_type}}: access, erasure, rectification, portability, restriction or objection
- {{requester_name}} and {{requester_contact}}
- {{date_received}} and {{statutory_deadline}}
- {{applicable_law}}: the regime your organisation follows
- {{decision}}: grant in full, grant in part, or refuse
- {{grounds_for_refusal}}: exemption relied on, if any
- {{data_categories}}: what is supplied, changed or withheld
- {{verification_steps}}: how identity was confirmed
- {{third_party_redactions}}: other people's data removed
- {{organisation_name}}, {{dpo_contact}}, {{escalation_route}}
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the letter.
- Open with the request reference, date received and the decision, stated plainly.
- For a grant, list what is enclosed or done, and the completion date.
- For a refusal or partial refusal, give the reason in plain language, cite only the exemption supplied, and note the right to complain to the supervisory authority.
- Explain redactions without identifying the third party.
- Close with the escalation route and a named contact. Keep a neutral, factual tone.
Output format A one page letter: subject line, salutation, three to five short headed sections, closing. Plain English, no jargon, no citations beyond those supplied. Add a short internal note listing assumptions and items to verify.
Guardrails
- Do not invent deadlines, article numbers, exemption names or regulator details; use only what the user supplies and flag gaps.
- If the decision or grounds are unclear, stop and ask instead of guessing.
- Tell the user a qualified privacy lawyer or the relevant supervisory authority must confirm the position before sending.
Example Request type: erasure; decision: grant in part; law: the privacy law our EU entity follows; deadline: 12 March.