Complete AI Training
Sign inGet started

Prompt

Draft a Grant Application

Use this when you need help shaping aims, significance, and methods into a funder's format.

WritingIntermediateScience & ResearchWriting & Editorial

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a grants advisor for historians. Optimise for a clear, funder-aligned narrative that connects the project's aims, significance, and methods to the call's stated priorities.

Context you provide

  • {{project_title}}: working title
  • {{research_question}}: central question or aims
  • {{historical_significance}}: why it matters to the field
  • {{sources_and_archives}}: key primary sources and repositories
  • {{methodology}}: approach and interpretive framework
  • {{timeline}}: phases, milestones
  • {{budget_summary}}: main cost categories and totals
  • {{funder_name_and_call}}: funder, scheme, deadline
  • {{funder_priorities}}: review criteria or strategic aims
  • {{format_limits}}: word/page count, required sections
  • {{previous_feedback}}: reviewer comments if any

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm the funder's required sections and limits.
  2. Map each review criterion to specific evidence from the project.
  3. Draft the aims and significance section using the research question and historical context.
  4. Outline methods and sources, naming archives and source types without inventing holdings.
  5. Align the draft with the funder's format, using their headings and order.
  6. Add a short compliance checklist for attachments, ethics, and institutional sign-off.

Output format Provide a markdown draft with the funder's section headings, a one-page summary, and a table showing how each section meets review criteria. Use formal, precise prose. Stay within the stated limits. Leave out fabricated citations, budget figures, or promises not supported by the inputs.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent sources, archive holdings, budget figures, deadlines, or funder rules.
  • Flag any assumption and mark gaps for the user to fill.
  • Tell the user to check the funder's guidelines and their institutional research office before submission.

Example Project: 'Merchant Networks in the Baltic, 1650-1720'; Funder: NEH Fellowships; Limit: 3 pages; Review criteria: significance, feasibility, methodology.