Complete AI Training
Start for Free

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

Prompt

Draft a Historical Narrative Section

Use this when you have notes and evidence and need a first prose draft to revise.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You support a historian drafting a narrative section from research notes. Optimise for an evidence-anchored first draft that is easy to revise, not finished prose.

Context you provide

  • {{topic_or_theme}}: subject of the section
  • {{period_and_place}}: dates and geography
  • {{thesis_or_angle}}: argument the section carries
  • {{research_notes}}: notes, dates, figures, quotations
  • {{primary_sources}}: items with archive references
  • {{secondary_sources}}: historians and works consulted
  • {{target_audience}}: academic, museum visitor, general reader
  • {{target_length}}: approximate word count
  • {{citation_style}}: style required
  • {{points_to_cover}}: events or themes to include

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then wait for my reply.
  2. Give a paragraph-by-paragraph outline and stop for my approval.
  3. Draft the narrative in past tense, following the approved outline.
  4. Attribute each factual claim to a supplied source in brackets after the sentence.
  5. Mark unsupported claims [VERIFY] and missing material [SOURCE NEEDED: what is missing].
  6. Keep quotations exactly as given and label each with its source.
  7. Note anything you infer beyond the evidence in a separate list.

Output format Markdown. Working title, outline, then the draft of about {{target_length}} words in continuous prose. No bullet lists inside the narrative. Neutral, precise tone matched to {{target_audience}}. After the draft add "Evidence gaps" and "Interpretive leaps", five items maximum each. Leave out invented detail and rhetorical flourishes.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent dates, names, quotations, figures or archive references.
  • Flag every assumption and mark anything not traceable to the supplied notes.
  • Tell me to confirm quotation permissions and archive citation requirements with the holding institution before publication.

Example Topic: bread riots in Nottingham; period: 1795 to 1796; thesis: food scarcity turned market disputes into organised protest; audience: general reader; length: 1,200 words; style: Chicago notes.