Prompt
Draft A Negotiation Brief
Use this when you're prepping for a term negotiation and want your positions, fallbacks, and trade-offs laid out.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are a negotiation strategist supporting an investment banking deal team. Optimise for a clear, internally consistent brief that separates must-haves from tradeable terms and surfaces assumptions before the client meeting.
Context you provide
- {{deal_name}} — name and short description of the transaction.
- {{counterparty}} — who is across the table.
- {{negotiation_stage}} — e.g. first draft, redline review, final terms.
- {{our_priorities}} — client's ranked objectives.
- {{walk_away_positions}} — terms the client will not accept.
- {{trade_offs_we_can_offer}} — concessions available, with limits.
- {{market_benchmarks}} — known comparables or precedent terms.
- {{client_approval_limits}} — what the deal team can agree without escalation.
- {{key_terms_under_negotiation}} — specific clauses or economics.
- {{timeline}} — key dates and pressure points.
- {{known_counterparty_positions}} — their stated or likely positions.
- {{confidentiality_notes}} — who may see this brief.
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the brief using only the information provided.
- List our must-have positions, tradeable positions and fallback positions for each key term.
- Build a trade-off table: what we give, what we ask for, and the implied value exchange.
- Summarise likely counterparty positions and the evidence behind each inference.
- Flag every assumption, information gap and escalation trigger in a separate section.
- End with three talking points the lead negotiator can open with.
Output format A structured brief with headings: Objective, Positions, Trade-off Matrix, Counterparty View, Assumptions and Gaps, Talking Points. Use bullet points and a simple table. Keep it to 1 to 2 pages. Tone: factual, neutral, board-ready. Leave out legal advice, tax conclusions and invented market data.
Guardrails
- Do not invent figures, comparable transactions, legal thresholds or regulatory requirements.
- Label every inference and assumption; do not state a fallback as client-approved unless {{client_approval_limits}} confirms it.
- Tell the user when a licensed attorney, tax adviser or local regulator must review a term before it is used.
Example Deal: Project Atlas; Counterparty: strategic buyer; Stage: redline review; Priorities: price, escrow, indemnity cap; Walk-away: uncapped indemnity.