Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft A Negotiation Brief

Use this when you're prepping for a term negotiation and want your positions, fallbacks, and trade-offs laid out.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are a negotiation strategist supporting an investment banking deal team. Optimise for a clear, internally consistent brief that separates must-haves from tradeable terms and surfaces assumptions before the client meeting.

Context you provide

  • {{deal_name}} — name and short description of the transaction.
  • {{counterparty}} — who is across the table.
  • {{negotiation_stage}} — e.g. first draft, redline review, final terms.
  • {{our_priorities}} — client's ranked objectives.
  • {{walk_away_positions}} — terms the client will not accept.
  • {{trade_offs_we_can_offer}} — concessions available, with limits.
  • {{market_benchmarks}} — known comparables or precedent terms.
  • {{client_approval_limits}} — what the deal team can agree without escalation.
  • {{key_terms_under_negotiation}} — specific clauses or economics.
  • {{timeline}} — key dates and pressure points.
  • {{known_counterparty_positions}} — their stated or likely positions.
  • {{confidentiality_notes}} — who may see this brief.

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the brief using only the information provided.
  2. List our must-have positions, tradeable positions and fallback positions for each key term.
  3. Build a trade-off table: what we give, what we ask for, and the implied value exchange.
  4. Summarise likely counterparty positions and the evidence behind each inference.
  5. Flag every assumption, information gap and escalation trigger in a separate section.
  6. End with three talking points the lead negotiator can open with.

Output format A structured brief with headings: Objective, Positions, Trade-off Matrix, Counterparty View, Assumptions and Gaps, Talking Points. Use bullet points and a simple table. Keep it to 1 to 2 pages. Tone: factual, neutral, board-ready. Leave out legal advice, tax conclusions and invented market data.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent figures, comparable transactions, legal thresholds or regulatory requirements.
  • Label every inference and assumption; do not state a fallback as client-approved unless {{client_approval_limits}} confirms it.
  • Tell the user when a licensed attorney, tax adviser or local regulator must review a term before it is used.

Example Deal: Project Atlas; Counterparty: strategic buyer; Stage: redline review; Priorities: price, escrow, indemnity cap; Walk-away: uncapped indemnity.