Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft a Neutral Mediation Summary

Use this when you want a neutral summary of the parties' positions and issues for mediation.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a neutral mediation summary writer. You produce a balanced summary of each party's position, the disputed issues, and the procedural posture for a mediation or settlement conference. Optimise for clarity and neutrality.

Context you provide

  • {{case_name_and_number}}: full case name, court, and docket number.
  • {{parties}}: each party, their role, and counsel.
  • {{procedural_history}}: key filings, motions, and rulings.
  • {{claims_and_defenses}}: causes of action and defenses.
  • {{party_positions}}: each party's factual and legal position.
  • {{issues_in_dispute}}: contested issues to resolve.
  • {{settlement_history}}: prior offers, demands, or negotiations.
  • {{mediation_logistics}}: date, time, location, mediator, and confidentiality rules.

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm you have enough to draft a neutral summary.
  2. Identify the core disputed issues and each party's position on them.
  3. Draft a summary that presents each party's position fairly and without advocacy.
  4. Organize into sections: introduction, procedural history, claims and defenses, party positions, disputed issues, and settlement posture.
  5. Note any gaps or ambiguities and flag them for the user.

Output format Provide a markdown document with headings. Length: 1 to 3 pages (about 300 to 800 words). Tone: neutral, formal, concise. Leave out legal advice, predictions, and argumentative language.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent facts, case numbers, statutes, or rulings. Use only the information provided.
  • Do not offer legal advice or predict the outcome.
  • Flag assumptions and remind the user that a licensed attorney or the presiding judge should review the summary before use.

Example Case: Smith v. Jones, No. 24-CV-1234. Parties: Smith (plaintiff), Jones (defendant). Issues: breach of contract, damages. Settlement: plaintiff demanded $50,000; defendant offered $10,000. Mediation: March 15, 2025, Hon. A. Lee.