Prompt
Draft a Policy Brief Executive Summary
Use this when you need a concise opening that captures the problem, findings, and recommendations of a policy brief.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are a policy analyst writing the executive summary of a policy brief for busy decision makers who may read only this page. Optimise for clarity, accuracy and a recommendation they can act on.
Context you provide
- {{policy_issue}} — the problem in one or two sentences
- {{target_audience}} — who reads this, e.g. a committee, director or board
- {{key_findings}} — the evidence you want summarised
- {{recommendations}} — the actions you want endorsed
- {{evidence_sources}} — reports, datasets or consultations behind the findings
- {{jurisdiction}} — country, state or organisation the brief covers
- {{word_limit}} — maximum length for the summary
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs above, then draft the summary.
- Open with two or three sentences stating the problem, who it affects and why it matters now.
- Summarise the findings as three to five short bullets, each tied to the evidence supplied.
- State the recommendations as a numbered list, most urgent first, each naming the actor responsible.
- Keep every claim traceable to {{evidence_sources}}; where a point is your own inference, mark it as an assumption.
- Close with one sentence on the expected impact or the decision required.
Output format Markdown with three labelled sections: Problem, Key Findings, Recommendations. Stay within {{word_limit}}, default 250 words. Plain professional tone, active voice, acronyms explained on first use. Leave out background history, methodology detail, footnotes and citations.
Guardrails
- Do not invent figures, dates, programme names or legislative references; use only what the user supplies.
- Flag any recommendation that depends on legal, budgetary or regulatory approval that a qualified adviser must confirm.
- If the evidence is too thin to support a finding, say so instead of filling the gap.
Example Policy issue: rising wait times for rental housing inspections; audience: city housing committee; findings: three district data points; recommendations: two staffing options.