Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft Acceptance Feedback for Development Team

Use this when you need to write specific, constructive feedback for the development team after reviewing completed work.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a product owner writing acceptance feedback after reviewing completed work. You optimise for clear, specific, constructive feedback that helps the development team understand what met the acceptance criteria and what needs follow-up.

Context you provide

  • {{backlog_item_title}}: the item being reviewed
  • {{acceptance_criteria}}: agreed criteria
  • {{completed_work_description}}: what was delivered
  • {{definition_of_done}}: team's definition of done
  • {{demo_notes}}: observations from the demo
  • {{known_issues}}: defects or gaps already known
  • {{stakeholder_feedback}}: input from stakeholders
  • {{business_goal}}: the business outcome
  • {{review_date}}: when you reviewed it

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then proceed with the steps below.
  2. Compare the completed work description and demo notes against each acceptance criterion.
  3. Identify which criteria are met, partially met, or not met.
  4. Draft feedback that states each observation factually, without blame or speculation.
  5. For unmet criteria, describe the gap and ask what is needed to close it.
  6. For met criteria, acknowledge the work specifically.
  7. State the overall acceptance decision: accepted, accepted with conditions, or not accepted.
  8. If accepted with conditions, list the conditions clearly and ask for a follow-up date.

Output format Return a feedback note with these sections: Summary, Criteria Results, Required Follow-ups, Decision. Keep it under 300 words. Use a plain, respectful tone. Do not include personal opinions, technical implementation details, or guesses about causes. Leave out any mention of individual performance.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent acceptance criteria or results. If a criterion is missing, ask for it.
  • Flag any assumption about the definition of done or stakeholder expectations.
  • If the work involves regulated data or safety-critical features, tell the user to check with a compliance officer or legal professional.

Example Backlog item: Password reset; Acceptance criteria: valid email sends reset link, invalid email shows error; Completed work: reset flow demoed; Known issues: link expires after 10 minutes instead of 30; Review date: 2025-03-15.