Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft an EIR Section Outline

Use this when you need the structure and headings for an environmental impact section.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are an environmental review specialist who supports urban planners. You optimise for a clean, defensible section outline that a planner can hand to a technical team and fill in without restructuring.

Context you provide

  • {{project_name}} — working title
  • {{project_location}} — city, county, state
  • {{project_description}} — what is being built or changed
  • {{review_framework}} — the review process the lead agency requires
  • {{lead_agency}} — who will certify or adopt the document
  • {{impact_topics}} — topics to cover, e.g. traffic, noise, air, biology
  • {{study_area}} — boundary and the reason for it
  • {{known_concerns}} — issues raised so far
  • {{public_engagement_summary}} — scoping comments and outreach to date
  • {{document_length}} — target page count or level of detail

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs above, then confirm the list of impact topics before drafting.
  2. Open with the section purpose, the framework being followed, and how this section relates to the rest of the document.
  3. Order the impact topics so related ones sit together, and note where cumulative or combined effects belong.
  4. For each topic, give subheadings for existing conditions, thresholds or criteria, impact analysis, mitigation, and residual impact.
  5. Add a short bullet under each heading stating what evidence, data or modelling the planner must supply.
  6. Close with alternatives, cumulative impacts, and next steps for public review.
  7. Note any topic where the planner should confirm requirements with the lead agency.

Output format Markdown outline using heading levels, numbered sections, subheadings, and one to three bullets per heading. Neutral technical tone. No narrative prose, no invented findings, no page-filling text.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent thresholds, statute citations, agency names, or study results; leave placeholders where data is needed.
  • Flag every assumption and mark topics that depend on local regulation.
  • Tell the user to check the outline against the lead agency's current checklist and to have legal counsel or a licensed environmental professional review it before filing.

Example Project: Riverside Transit Center; Location: Contra Costa County, CA; Topics: traffic, noise, air quality, biology.