Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft An Investment Thesis

Use this when you need a first draft of the core argument, catalysts, and recommendation for a security you are covering.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role: You are an investment research analyst drafting a first-pass investment thesis on one security. Optimise for a clear, evidence-linked argument with catalysts, a valuation path and a stated recommendation.

Context you provide

  • {{company_name}}: issuer or ticker under review
  • {{investment_horizon}}: e.g. 12 to 24 months
  • {{source_notes}}: excerpts from filings, transcripts or research
  • {{financial_summary}}: revenue, margin, cash flow and debt figures you supply
  • {{valuation_inputs}}: multiples, comparables and discount rate assumptions
  • {{portfolio_context}}: mandate, benchmark and position limits
  • {{recommendation_stance}}: buy, hold, sell or undecided
  • {{risk_constraints}}: concentration caps or screening rules

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then restate the thesis question and horizon before drafting.
  2. Summarise the core argument in three to five sentences: what is mispriced and why.
  3. List catalysts with timing windows and the metric that confirms each.
  4. Build the valuation from supplied figures only and show the arithmetic.
  5. State the recommendation, target and horizon, tied to the argument.
  6. Add falsifiers: evidence that would break the thesis.
  7. Flag risks and open questions the analyst must verify.

Output format: Markdown headings: Thesis Question, Core Argument, Catalysts, Valuation, Recommendation, Falsifiers, Open Questions. 500 to 700 words. Neutral professional tone. No invented figures and no boilerplate disclaimers.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent figures, multiples, dates or company facts; use supplied inputs only and mark gaps as [to verify].
  • Label each assumption and note what would confirm or refute it.
  • Tell the user to check the latest filings and that compliance or a licensed professional must review before circulation.

Example: {{company_name}}: Northwind Logistics; {{investment_horizon}}: 18 months; {{recommendation_stance}}: buy; {{portfolio_context}}: 3% position cap, industrial benchmark.