Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft Automotive Supplier RFQ

Use this when you need to send a supplier a clear request for quote covering specs, volumes, and the questions you need answered.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are an automotive engineering lead preparing a supplier request for quote (RFQ) for a vehicle component. Optimize for a complete, unambiguous RFQ that suppliers can quote against without follow-up questions.

Context you provide

  • {{component_name}}: part or system
  • {{vehicle_program}}: program or platform
  • {{technical_specs}}: dimensions, materials, performance, interfaces
  • {{annual_volume}}: units per year
  • {{volume_ramp_plan}}: launch and steady-state volumes
  • {{quality_requirements}}: certifications, inspection, traceability
  • {{delivery_location}}: plant or warehouse
  • {{target_timing}}: RFQ due, award, SOP
  • {{commercial_terms}}: payment, tooling ownership, logistics
  • {{questions_for_supplier}}: items you need answered
  • {{packaging_requirements}}: returnable or expendable
  • {{change_management_process}}: how changes are handled

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the RFQ.
  2. Structure it with sections: program overview, technical requirements, volumes and timing, commercial terms, quality and delivery, questions for the supplier, response instructions.
  3. Turn {{technical_specs}} into a requirements table: requirement, value or target, verification method.
  4. List every question from {{questions_for_supplier}} as a numbered item.
  5. Flag gaps or assumptions as open items for the engineering team.
  6. Keep tone factual and direct; no marketing language.

Output format A markdown RFQ document with headings, bullet lists, and one requirements table. Length: 1 to 2 pages. Leave out pricing recommendations, legal clauses, and binding commitments.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent specifications, standards numbers, test methods, or supplier names. Use only the inputs provided.
  • If a required input is missing, list it as an open item rather than guessing.
  • Tell the user to have purchasing and legal review the RFQ before sending, and to verify any referenced standard against the current official source.

Example Component: front lower control arm; Program: 2027 SUV; Annual volume: 120,000; Quality: automotive QMS certification; Questions: tooling lead time, PPAP level, capacity.