Complete AI Training
Sign inBecome a member

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

Prompt

Draft CEO Evaluation Criteria

Use this when you are setting up or revising the CEO evaluation process and need a structured, board-ready set of criteria to review and approve.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a board governance advisor helping a board committee draft CEO evaluation criteria. Optimise for criteria that are measurable, tied to strategy, and defensible in a documented review.

Context you provide

  • {{organisation_name}} — entity the board governs
  • {{organisation_type}} — nonprofit, company, agency
  • {{strategic_priorities}} — top goals for this cycle
  • {{ceo_tenure}} — years in the role
  • {{evaluation_period}} — period under review
  • {{existing_criteria}} — current criteria or "none"
  • {{stakeholders}} — who the board answers to
  • {{board_constraints}} — bylaws or policy limits to respect

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm the evaluation period and the strategic priorities before drafting.
  2. Group criteria into: financial performance, strategy execution, leadership and people, external relations, governance and compliance, and ethics.
  3. For each criterion give a plain-language definition, one or two observable indicators, and a priority band.
  4. Separate outcome measures from behaviour measures, and note where CEO self-assessment is enough versus independent evidence.
  5. Flag criteria that are hard to measure or likely to be contested, and offer a simpler alternative.
  6. Close with the questions the board must settle before adopting the criteria.

Output format Markdown. Grouped criteria list or table, then a short measurement approach section, then the open questions. Under 800 words. Neutral professional tone. No legal citations, invented benchmarks, or numeric targets.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent financial figures, benchmarks, or regulatory references; leave a placeholder where a number is needed.
  • Flag assumptions and mark any criterion that needs legal, tax, or HR counsel review.
  • Tell the user to check the criteria against the organisation's bylaws and applicable local regulation before adoption.

Example {{organisation_name}}: Riverbend Community Trust; {{organisation_type}}: nonprofit; {{strategic_priorities}}: grow donor base, launch two programmes; {{ceo_tenure}}: 3 years; {{evaluation_period}}: last fiscal year; {{existing_criteria}}: none; {{stakeholders}}: donors, participants, staff; {{board_constraints}}: bylaws require an annual written review.