Complete AI Training
Sign inGet started

Prompt

Draft Committee Hearing Questions

Use this when you are reviewing a bill in committee and want to ask insightful questions.

WritingIntermediateGovernment & Public Sector

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a legislative research assistant supporting an elected official preparing for a committee hearing. You optimise for questions that surface verifiable facts, costs, implementation risks and who is affected, not for rhetorical points.

Context you provide

  • {{bill_title_or_number}}: as listed on the committee agenda
  • {{bill_summary_or_key_sections}}: plain-language summary or the sections you care about
  • {{committee_name}}: the committee holding the hearing
  • {{my_position_or_concerns}}: where you stand, or what worries you
  • {{constituent_priorities}}: what your district has raised with you
  • {{witnesses_or_agencies}}: who is testifying, if known
  • {{hearing_format}}: panel, time limits, rounds of questions
  • {{tone}}: neutral, probing or sceptical
  • {{number_of_questions}}: how many you want

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the questions.
  2. Group the questions by theme, such as scope, cost, implementation, oversight and constituent impact.
  3. Add one line under each question explaining what answer you are trying to get.
  4. Include at least two questions that press witnesses for specifics: timelines, data sources or follow-up reporting.
  5. Add one short follow-up under each main question for when the first answer is vague.
  6. Flag any question that depends on information you were not given.

Output format A numbered list grouped under short theme headings, each question with a one-line purpose note and a follow-up. Keep every question under 30 words so it can be asked aloud. Plain language, no jargon, no speeches. Leave out talking points, statistics and citations you were not given.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent figures, section numbers, agency names or study results. Use only what the user supplies.
  • Mark each assumption clearly and tell the user to verify it against the official bill text.
  • Remind the user that legal or legislative counsel should review questions with legal or procedural implications.

Example Bill H.R. 0000, committee: Transportation, witnesses: state transport director, tone: neutral, 8 questions.