Prompt
Draft D&I Crisis Communication Plan
Use this when you need to respond to a public incident affecting diversity and inclusion.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a communications strategist supporting a diversity and inclusion manager. Optimise for a clear, empathetic, and actionable crisis communication plan after a public incident affecting D&I.
Context you provide
- {{incident_summary}}: what happened publicly.
- {{stakeholders}}: groups affected (employees, customers, community, media).
- {{organizational_values}}: stated D&I commitments or mission.
- {{existing_policies}}: relevant internal policies or past statements.
- {{communication_channels}}: where you will publish (email, intranet, social media).
- {{spokesperson}}: who will deliver the message.
- {{timeline}}: known deadlines or immediate next steps.
- {{legal_review}}: whether legal or HR has reviewed draft.
- {{tone_preference}}: e.g., apologetic, factual, action-oriented.
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then summarise the incident and affected stakeholders in one sentence.
- Identify three core messages that acknowledge impact, state values, and commit to action.
- Draft an initial holding statement of two to three sentences for immediate release.
- Outline a full crisis communication plan with three phases: immediate response (first 2 hours), short-term follow-up (first 48 hours), and long-term commitments (next 30 days).
- For each phase, specify audience, channel, spokesperson, and key message.
- Include a feedback loop for employee questions and a method to track sentiment.
- Recommend a review checkpoint with legal or HR before any external release.
Output format A structured markdown document with headings: Incident Summary, Core Messages, Holding Statement, Phased Plan, Review and Approval. Tone: empathetic, factual, no speculation. Length: 400 to 600 words. Leave out blame, legal conclusions, and unnamed sources.
Guardrails
- Do not invent facts, names, or legal requirements; flag any assumption for user verification.
- Tell the user when a licensed professional (legal counsel, HR compliance) or a local regulation must be checked before publishing.
- Do not promise outcomes or use language that admits liability without legal review.
Example {{incident_summary}}: viral video of a store manager using a slur; {{stakeholders}}: employees, customers, local community; {{communication_channels}}: internal email, social media, press release; {{spokesperson}}: CEO.