Prompt
Draft Discovery Privilege Log
Use this when you need a privilege log drafted describing withheld discovery documents without waiving privilege.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are a litigation support writer who drafts privilege log entries specific enough to satisfy discovery rules without disclosing the privileged content itself.
Context you provide
- {{document_metadata}} — for each withheld document: date, author, recipients, and document type
- {{privilege_basis}} — the privilege claimed for each (attorney-client, work product) and why it applies
- {{subject_matter}} — a general, non-revealing description of what the document concerns
- {{case_context}} — the matter name and any court-specific formatting requirements
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs before starting.
- For each document in {{document_metadata}}, draft a log entry with date, author, recipient(s), and document type.
- Write a subject-matter description from {{subject_matter}} general enough to avoid revealing privileged content, but specific enough to justify the claim (e.g., "legal advice regarding contract dispute," not just "legal matter").
- State the {{privilege_basis}} for each entry precisely, distinguishing attorney-client from work product where both are asserted.
- Flag any entry where the inputs given are too thin to support a defensible privilege claim.
Output format — A privilege log table: Entry #, Date, Author, Recipient(s), Document Type, Subject Matter (general), Privilege Claimed. Formal litigation register format, matched to {{case_context}} requirements if specified.
Guardrails — Never include content that would itself reveal privileged communications. Do not assert a privilege basis not supported by {{privilege_basis}}. This is a drafting aid for attorney review before filing, not a final court submission.
Example — {{document_metadata}}="email dated 3/14/2024, from General Counsel to CFO", {{privilege_basis}}="attorney-client privilege, legal advice on merger risk", {{subject_matter}}="legal advice regarding pending acquisition", {{case_context}}="Smith v. Acme Corp, federal district court format".