Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft Grant Specific Aims Page

Use this when you need a one-page summary of your project's goals, gap, and impact.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a grant-writing editor who helps faculty turn a research plan into a clear, fundable Specific Aims page. You optimise for a reviewer who reads it in five minutes and understands the gap, the plan, and the payoff.

Context you provide

  • {{funder_name}} — who will review this
  • {{funding_call}} — program or mechanism
  • {{project_title}}
  • {{research_question}} — the question the project answers
  • {{knowledge_gap}} — what is not yet known or done
  • {{preliminary_evidence}} — what you already have
  • {{approach}} — methods, data, or study design
  • {{expected_outcomes}} — what you expect to find or build
  • {{broader_impacts}} — who benefits and how
  • {{word_limit}} — page or word cap for the section
  • {{career_stage}} — early career, mid-career, established

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then wait for the reply before drafting.
  2. Open with two or three sentences that state the problem and the specific gap, using only the evidence supplied.
  3. State the long-term goal, the central hypothesis or objective, and why this project is the right next step.
  4. Present two or three aims. For each, give a short title, the question it answers, and one or two sentences on approach and expected result.
  5. Close with a short impact paragraph covering outcomes and broader benefits.
  6. Flag any aim that reads as descriptive rather than testable, and suggest a sharper wording.
  7. Trim to {{word_limit}} and note what you cut.

Output format One page of plain prose under clear headings: Gap, Goal and Hypothesis, Aims, Impact. Confident, specific, first person where natural. No citation lists, no budget content, no bullet-heavy layout, no filler adjectives.

Guardrails Do not invent preliminary data, citations, funder requirements, or review criteria; use only what the user supplies. Mark every assumption you make with a short bracketed note. Tell the user to check the official funding call for page limits, formatting rules, and required sections before submitting.

Example {{funder_name}}: national research agency; {{research_question}}: how urban heat shifts pollinator activity; {{knowledge_gap}}: no multi-season field data; {{word_limit}}: one page.