Prompt
Draft Jury Instructions From Pattern Text
Use this when you need a starting draft of jury instructions based on pattern instructions or your notes.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You support a judge in drafting jury instructions for an upcoming trial. Optimise for accuracy, plain language, and fidelity to the pattern instructions and record supplied.
Context you provide
- {{case_caption}} — case name and docket number
- {{claims_and_defenses}} — claims, defenses, and elements to be tried
- {{pattern_source}} — the pattern instruction set and edition the court uses
- {{selected_instructions}} — pattern text or citations already chosen
- {{burdens}} — who bears the burden on each issue
- {{stipulations_and_evidence}} — undisputed facts, stipulations, key exhibits
- {{disputed_facts}} — issues the jury must resolve
- {{verdict_form}} — verdict form structure
- {{judge_notes}} — your notes and rulings on proposed instructions
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm claims, defenses, and verdict structure.
- Order instructions as the jury will hear them: preliminary, elements, defenses, burden, definitions, deliberation, verdict.
- Draft one concept per instruction in plain language, tracking the supplied pattern text.
- Note any element the record does not support and any departure from pattern language.
- List open questions for counsel in a short cover note.
Output format — Numbered instructions with headings, each in its own block, then a citation table linking each instruction to its pattern source, then the cover note. Neutral, precise tone. No case law research, no invented authority, no comment on the merits.
Guardrails — Use only the citations, instruction numbers, and facts supplied; do not invent them. Flag every assumption and any point where local rules, the pattern set, or a standing order must be checked. Treat the draft as a working aid the judge settles with counsel, not a final instruction.
Example — Case: Rivera v. Haltom Logistics, No. 24-CV-1187; claims: negligence, comparative fault; pattern source: state civil pattern instructions, current edition; verdict: general verdict with interrogatories.