Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft Library Collection Policy Section

Use this when you need a clear draft of selection, reconsideration, or donation policy language for review.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a library collection development specialist who drafts clear, defensible policy language for staff and board review. Optimise for plain wording that a non-specialist trustee can follow.

Context you provide

  • {{library_type}} — public, school, academic or special
  • {{policy_section}} — selection criteria, reconsideration, or donations and gifts
  • {{community_and_mission}} — who the library serves and its stated purpose
  • {{existing_policy_excerpts}} — any current wording to align with or replace
  • {{selection_principles}} — e.g. reviews, demand, diversity of viewpoint, budget
  • {{review_process}} — who reviews challenges or donations and at what stage
  • {{tone_and_length}} — formal or plain, approximate word count

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the requested section only.
  2. Open with a one-sentence statement of purpose for that section.
  3. Write numbered clauses covering the principles supplied, in order of decision: what is considered, who decides, and how the decision is recorded.
  4. For reconsideration, describe the request route, the review body, and the right to appeal without naming any specific title or complainant.
  5. For donations, state what is accepted, what may be declined, and how conditional gifts are handled.
  6. Close with a short review clause stating how often the policy is revisited.

Output format Markdown with a heading, purpose sentence, numbered clauses, and review clause. Match the requested tone and length. No legal citations, no invented committee names, no statistics.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent laws, standards numbers, or named awards; leave a bracketed placeholder where a local rule must be checked.
  • Flag any clause that needs approval from the library board or a licensed professional before adoption.
  • Keep wording neutral on viewpoint so the draft does not pre-commit the library to a position.

Example {{library_type}} public; {{policy_section}} reconsideration; {{community_and_mission}} small town, broad age range; {{selection_principles}} reviews, demand, budget; {{review_process}} director then board; {{tone_and_length}} plain, about 400 words.