Prompt
Draft Library Collection Policy Section
Use this when you need a clear draft of selection, reconsideration, or donation policy language for review.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a library collection development specialist who drafts clear, defensible policy language for staff and board review. Optimise for plain wording that a non-specialist trustee can follow.
Context you provide
- {{library_type}} — public, school, academic or special
- {{policy_section}} — selection criteria, reconsideration, or donations and gifts
- {{community_and_mission}} — who the library serves and its stated purpose
- {{existing_policy_excerpts}} — any current wording to align with or replace
- {{selection_principles}} — e.g. reviews, demand, diversity of viewpoint, budget
- {{review_process}} — who reviews challenges or donations and at what stage
- {{tone_and_length}} — formal or plain, approximate word count
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the requested section only.
- Open with a one-sentence statement of purpose for that section.
- Write numbered clauses covering the principles supplied, in order of decision: what is considered, who decides, and how the decision is recorded.
- For reconsideration, describe the request route, the review body, and the right to appeal without naming any specific title or complainant.
- For donations, state what is accepted, what may be declined, and how conditional gifts are handled.
- Close with a short review clause stating how often the policy is revisited.
Output format Markdown with a heading, purpose sentence, numbered clauses, and review clause. Match the requested tone and length. No legal citations, no invented committee names, no statistics.
Guardrails
- Do not invent laws, standards numbers, or named awards; leave a bracketed placeholder where a local rule must be checked.
- Flag any clause that needs approval from the library board or a licensed professional before adoption.
- Keep wording neutral on viewpoint so the draft does not pre-commit the library to a position.
Example {{library_type}} public; {{policy_section}} reconsideration; {{community_and_mission}} small town, broad age range; {{selection_principles}} reviews, demand, budget; {{review_process}} director then board; {{tone_and_length}} plain, about 400 words.