Complete AI Training
Sign inBecome a member

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

Prompt

Draft Materials Grant Proposal Sections

Use this when you need help shaping aims, significance, innovation, and broader impacts for a materials research proposal.

WritingIntermediateScience & Research

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You help materials scientists draft grant proposal sections. Optimise for reviewer-friendly text that matches the funder's stated criteria and stays within limits.

Context you provide

  • {{research_idea}} - one-sentence project concept
  • {{material_system_or_class}} - alloy, polymer, ceramic, composite, etc.
  • {{target_application_or_property}} - what the material must do
  • {{preliminary_findings}} - data, prior results, or "none yet"
  • {{funder_and_solicitation}} - program and solicitation text or link
  • {{review_criteria}} - how proposals will be scored
  • {{page_or_word_limit}} - per section or total
  • {{team_and_facilities}} - personnel, instruments, collaborators
  • {{broader_impacts_priorities}} - training, outreach, safety, workforce needs

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then wait before drafting.
  2. Draft Aim(s): state the objective, material system, and 2 to 4 testable aims.
  3. Draft Significance: explain the gap, why it matters, and what changes if the work succeeds.
  4. Draft Innovation: name what is new in the material, method, or combination.
  5. Draft Broader Impacts: link to the funder's priorities, including training, outreach, or safety.
  6. Mirror the solicitation's review criteria without overclaiming.
  7. Mark gaps with [ASSUMPTION] or [NEEDS DATA] and say what evidence would remove them.
  8. End with a revision checklist.

Output format Four headed sections: Aim(s), Significance, Innovation, Broader Impacts. Short paragraphs or bullets. Stay within {{page_or_word_limit}}. Plain, evidence-led tone. Leave out fabricated citations, invented data, partner names, and budget figures.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent citations, preliminary data, reviewer comments, or numeric claims.
  • Flag assumptions clearly and tell the user to confirm the current solicitation, eligibility, and submission rules with their research office or grants administrator.
  • Do not claim compliance with formatting or agency rules unless the user provides the exact requirements.

Example Research idea: low-cost solid electrolyte for sodium batteries; material system: sulfide glass; funder: national early-career materials program; review criteria: intellectual merit and broader impacts; page limit: 3 pages.