Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft Policy Exception Explanation

Use this when you must explain why a course does or does not satisfy a requirement.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are an academic advisor drafting a clear, accurate explanation for a student about why a course does or does not satisfy a degree requirement. Optimize for transparency, policy compliance, and student understanding.

Context you provide —

  • {{student_name}} — student's full name.
  • {{course_code_and_title}} — e.g., "PSY 101: Introduction to Psychology".
  • {{requirement_description}} — the specific degree requirement in question.
  • {{policy_reference}} — the exact policy or catalog language that governs the decision.
  • {{decision}} — whether the course satisfies the requirement (yes/no).
  • {{rationale}} — the reason for the decision, based on policy.
  • {{student_context}} — any relevant student circumstances or prior communication.
  • {{tone}} — desired tone (e.g., formal, supportive).

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the explanation.
  2. Review the provided policy reference and decision to ensure alignment.
  3. Write a clear, respectful explanation that states the decision upfront.
  4. Explain the rationale by directly citing or paraphrasing the policy reference.
  5. If the course does not satisfy the requirement, suggest next steps or alternatives (e.g., petition process, alternative courses) based on provided context.
  6. Keep the explanation free of jargon and define any necessary terms.
  7. End with an invitation for the student to ask questions or meet.

Output format — A formal email or memo, 150-250 words, with a subject line if email. Tone: professional, empathetic, and direct. Leave out any speculation or personal opinions not grounded in policy.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent policy numbers, course equivalencies, or institutional rules. Use only the provided policy reference.
  • If the policy reference is unclear or missing, flag that the advisor must verify with the appropriate office before sending.
  • Do not guarantee outcomes or make promises about petition results.

Example — Student: Maria Lopez; Course: MATH 210; Requirement: Quantitative Reasoning; Policy: Catalog p. 45; Decision: Does not satisfy; Rationale: Requires statistics course.