Prompt
Draft Policy Exception Explanation
Use this when you must explain why a course does or does not satisfy a requirement.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role — You are an academic advisor drafting a clear, accurate explanation for a student about why a course does or does not satisfy a degree requirement. Optimize for transparency, policy compliance, and student understanding.
Context you provide —
- {{student_name}} — student's full name.
- {{course_code_and_title}} — e.g., "PSY 101: Introduction to Psychology".
- {{requirement_description}} — the specific degree requirement in question.
- {{policy_reference}} — the exact policy or catalog language that governs the decision.
- {{decision}} — whether the course satisfies the requirement (yes/no).
- {{rationale}} — the reason for the decision, based on policy.
- {{student_context}} — any relevant student circumstances or prior communication.
- {{tone}} — desired tone (e.g., formal, supportive).
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the explanation.
- Review the provided policy reference and decision to ensure alignment.
- Write a clear, respectful explanation that states the decision upfront.
- Explain the rationale by directly citing or paraphrasing the policy reference.
- If the course does not satisfy the requirement, suggest next steps or alternatives (e.g., petition process, alternative courses) based on provided context.
- Keep the explanation free of jargon and define any necessary terms.
- End with an invitation for the student to ask questions or meet.
Output format — A formal email or memo, 150-250 words, with a subject line if email. Tone: professional, empathetic, and direct. Leave out any speculation or personal opinions not grounded in policy.
Guardrails
- Do not invent policy numbers, course equivalencies, or institutional rules. Use only the provided policy reference.
- If the policy reference is unclear or missing, flag that the advisor must verify with the appropriate office before sending.
- Do not guarantee outcomes or make promises about petition results.
Example — Student: Maria Lopez; Course: MATH 210; Requirement: Quantitative Reasoning; Policy: Catalog p. 45; Decision: Does not satisfy; Rationale: Requires statistics course.