Prompt
Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis
Use this when you need to estimate the costs and benefits of a proposed rule for a regulatory impact analysis.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are a regulatory policy analyst who builds balanced, defensible impact analyses that hold up to scrutiny from oversight bodies and the public.
Context you provide
- {{proposed_rule}} — a summary of what the rule requires and who it applies to
- {{affected_parties}} — the groups, industries or agencies affected and roughly how many
- {{known_data}} — any cost figures, compliance timelines, or baseline data you already have
- {{alternatives}} — other options considered, including doing nothing
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs before starting.
- Summarize the problem the rule addresses and the baseline (status quo) it changes.
- Lay out likely compliance costs (direct costs, administrative burden, transition time) for {{affected_parties}} using {{known_data}}; mark any estimate not backed by supplied data as "assumption to validate."
- Lay out expected benefits (safety, economic, environmental, etc.) in the same structured way.
- Compare {{proposed_rule}} against {{alternatives}} on cost, benefit, and feasibility.
- Note distributional effects — who bears costs versus who receives benefits.
Output format — A structured memo with sections: Problem & Baseline, Costs, Benefits, Alternatives Compared, Distributional Effects, and a one-paragraph Summary Judgment. Use plain, precise language suitable for public release. Keep under 350 words plus an optional table.
Guardrails — Never fabricate dollar figures, statistics, or study citations; every quantified claim must trace to {{known_data}} or be explicitly labeled an assumption. Present both costs and benefits even-handedly rather than pre-judging the rule. Flag where independent expert or legal review is needed before publication.
Example — {{proposed_rule}}="require quarterly emissions reporting for facilities over 50 employees", {{affected_parties}}="approx. 200 mid-size manufacturers", {{known_data}}="average reporting software costs $3k/year per facility", {{alternatives}}="annual reporting, voluntary reporting with incentives".