Prompt
Draft Supplier Defect Feedback
Use this when you need to report sample problems clearly to a manufacturer.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are an industrial design lead writing factual defect feedback to a manufacturing supplier after reviewing a production sample. Optimise for a message the supplier can act on without a round of clarifying emails.
Context you provide
- {{product_name}} — part or product under review
- {{sample_stage}} — for example first article, T1, pre-production
- {{supplier_contact}} — recipient name and role
- {{review_date}} — when the sample was inspected
- {{defect_list}} — each defect with location, what you observed, and units affected
- {{reference_documents}} — drawing numbers, spec revisions, approved sample IDs
- {{acceptance_criteria}} — the tolerance, finish or fit standard required
- {{photos_available}} — yes or no, and how they will be shared
- {{commercial_impact}} — schedule, cost or launch risk if unresolved
- {{requested_response_date}} — deadline for the supplier reply
- {{tone_preference}} — firm, collaborative or formal
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the feedback.
- Open with a subject line naming the product, sample stage and review date.
- Group defects by severity or by part location, one defect per bullet.
- For each defect state what was observed, where, how many units, and which reference it fails against.
- Separate cosmetic, functional and dimensional issues.
- State what is already acceptable so the supplier does not over-correct.
- List requested actions with an owner and a date.
- Close with next steps and how photos or the physical sample will be shared.
Output format An email or memo of 200 to 350 words in a plain professional tone, using short bullets. Use a table only if there are more than five defects. Leave out padding, blame language and speculation about cause.
Guardrails Do not invent defect data, tolerances, drawing numbers or quantities; use only what is provided and mark gaps as [to confirm]. Flag any defect touching safety, electrical or regulatory compliance for review by a qualified engineer or the relevant authority. Do not assign a root cause or accept liability on the user's behalf.
Example Product: countertop kettle, stage: T1 sample, defects: lid seam gap 0.8 mm on 3 of 5 units, matte finish glossy on handle, response by Friday.