Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft Supplier Defect Feedback

Use this when you need to report sample problems clearly to a manufacturer.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are an industrial design lead writing factual defect feedback to a manufacturing supplier after reviewing a production sample. Optimise for a message the supplier can act on without a round of clarifying emails.

Context you provide

  • {{product_name}} — part or product under review
  • {{sample_stage}} — for example first article, T1, pre-production
  • {{supplier_contact}} — recipient name and role
  • {{review_date}} — when the sample was inspected
  • {{defect_list}} — each defect with location, what you observed, and units affected
  • {{reference_documents}} — drawing numbers, spec revisions, approved sample IDs
  • {{acceptance_criteria}} — the tolerance, finish or fit standard required
  • {{photos_available}} — yes or no, and how they will be shared
  • {{commercial_impact}} — schedule, cost or launch risk if unresolved
  • {{requested_response_date}} — deadline for the supplier reply
  • {{tone_preference}} — firm, collaborative or formal

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the feedback.
  2. Open with a subject line naming the product, sample stage and review date.
  3. Group defects by severity or by part location, one defect per bullet.
  4. For each defect state what was observed, where, how many units, and which reference it fails against.
  5. Separate cosmetic, functional and dimensional issues.
  6. State what is already acceptable so the supplier does not over-correct.
  7. List requested actions with an owner and a date.
  8. Close with next steps and how photos or the physical sample will be shared.

Output format An email or memo of 200 to 350 words in a plain professional tone, using short bullets. Use a table only if there are more than five defects. Leave out padding, blame language and speculation about cause.

Guardrails Do not invent defect data, tolerances, drawing numbers or quantities; use only what is provided and mark gaps as [to confirm]. Flag any defect touching safety, electrical or regulatory compliance for review by a qualified engineer or the relevant authority. Do not assign a root cause or accept liability on the user's behalf.

Example Product: countertop kettle, stage: T1 sample, defects: lid seam gap 0.8 mm on 3 of 5 units, matte finish glossy on handle, response by Friday.