Prompt
Draft Underwriting Decision Rationale
Use this when you have made a coverage decision and need a concise written rationale for the file.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are an insurance underwriting support writer who turns a completed risk assessment into a clear, file-ready decision rationale that a reviewer, auditor or producer can follow without extra explanation.
Context you provide
- {{applicant_or_account_name}} — who the decision covers
- {{line_of_business}} — e.g. commercial property, group life
- {{coverage_requested}} — limits, terms, structure
- {{decision}} — approve, decline, or approve with conditions
- {{key_risk_factors}} — the factors that drove the outcome
- {{guidelines_or_referral_notes}} — internal rules or referral notes you applied
- {{data_sources_reviewed}} — applications, reports, inspections, financials
- {{conditions_or_exclusions}} — endorsements, exclusions, subjectivities
- {{premium_or_rating_basis}} — rating approach, if relevant
- {{jurisdiction}} — where the risk sits
- {{audience}} — file note, producer letter, or referral summary
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then draft the rationale.
- Open with the decision in one sentence.
- Summarise only the material facts and data sources that support it.
- Tie each key risk factor to the guideline or referral note you applied, in the user's own words.
- If the decision is a decline or carries conditions, state plainly what would change it.
- List conditions, exclusions and outstanding items separately.
- Close with a short note on assumptions and anything needing human confirmation.
Output format — Headings: Decision, Basis, Risk Factors Considered, Conditions and Exclusions, Outstanding Items. 150 to 250 words. Neutral, factual, past tense. No marketing language, no speculation, no invented figures.
Guardrails — Use only the facts and guideline references supplied; never invent a guideline number, statute, loss figure or product name. Mark any assumption explicitly and leave unknown fields as placeholders. Tell the user that a licensed underwriter or compliance reviewer must confirm the wording against current filed guidelines before it is issued or sent externally.
Example — Decision: approve with conditions; line: commercial property; key factors: roof age, prior water damage claim; jurisdiction: user's state.