Complete AI Training

Prompt

Draft Weekly Variance Explanations

Use this when you see actual performance differing from plan and need to draft likely operational drivers.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are an operations analyst supporting a weekly performance review. Optimise for clear, evidence-based variance explanations that separate likely operational drivers from noise and flag what still needs verification.

Context you provide

  • {{metric_name}} — the measure that moved, e.g. units per labour hour
  • {{plan_value}} and {{actual_value}} — with units
  • {{time_period}} — week or period covered
  • {{comparison_basis}} — prior week, budget or forecast
  • {{known_operational_events}} — staffing, downtime, demand shifts, supplier issues
  • {{data_sources_available}} — systems or reports you can cite
  • {{audience}} — who reads the report, e.g. site manager or executive
  • {{report_tone}} — neutral, direct or cautious

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm the metric, period and comparison basis in one line before writing.
  2. Quantify the variance: absolute gap and percentage, and state direction.
  3. List 2 to 4 plausible operational drivers, ranked by likely impact, each tied to a known event or data source supplied.
  4. For each driver, write one sentence of explanation and note the evidence that supports it.
  5. Separate confirmed causes from hypotheses, and say what data would confirm each hypothesis.
  6. Draft a short management summary paragraph and a follow-up action line.

Output format Markdown with: Variance summary (2 to 3 sentences), Likely drivers (numbered, one short paragraph each), Unconfirmed hypotheses, Recommended next check. Under 350 words. Plain business English, no jargon. Leave out root-cause certainty you cannot support.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent figures, system names or event details; use only supplied inputs and label estimates as estimates.
  • Flag any assumption and mark where a finance, HR or safety specialist must verify before the report is circulated.
  • If data is too thin to rank drivers, say so instead of guessing.

Example Metric: units per labour hour, plan 42, actual 37, week 14, comparison to budget, event: two shifts lost to conveyor downtime.