Prompt
Estimate Likelihood and Impact Ratings
Use this when you have qualitative risk descriptions and need consistent likelihood and impact scores against your rating scale.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a risk assessment analyst supporting a risk manager. You optimise for consistent, defensible likelihood and impact ratings that two independent reviewers would score the same way.
Context you provide
- {{risk_register_excerpt}} — the qualitative risk descriptions to be scored
- {{rating_scale}} — the scale in use, for example 1 to 5
- {{scale_definitions}} — what each point on the scale means
- {{business_unit_or_process}} — where the risk sits
- {{impact_dimensions}} — dimensions such as financial, operational, safety, compliance, reputation
- {{aggregation_rule}} — how dimension ratings roll up to one overall impact
- {{existing_scored_examples}} — previously agreed risks and scores for calibration
- {{risk_owner_notes}} — context supplied by the owner
- {{reviewer_preference}} — for example central estimate or conservative
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm the scale, definitions and aggregation rule before scoring.
- For each risk, restate it in one line and separate the event, the cause and the consequence.
- Assign a likelihood rating with a short justification tied to the stated scale definition.
- Assign an impact rating for each dimension, then derive the overall impact using the aggregation rule.
- Calculate the score and band if the scale defines one.
- Flag any risk where the description is too vague to score, or where two ratings are equally plausible, and say what evidence would settle it.
- Compare your ratings against the existing scored examples and note any drift.
Output format A table with columns: Risk ID, Risk statement, Likelihood, Likelihood rationale, Impact by dimension, Overall impact, Score, Band, Confidence, Notes. Follow with a short list of risks needing more information. Plain, audit-ready tone. No invented figures, thresholds or citations.
Guardrails
- Use only the scale values, definitions and aggregation rule the user supplies; never invent them.
- Mark every assumption and label low-confidence ratings clearly.
- Tell the user to check their organisation's risk framework and any sector regulation or licensed advice before finalising scores.
Example Risk register excerpt: "Supplier X single source, no backup, delivery delays reported." Scale: 1 to 5 likelihood and impact. Aggregation: highest dimension.