Complete AI Training

Prompt

Estimate Likelihood and Impact Ratings

Use this when you have qualitative risk descriptions and need consistent likelihood and impact scores against your rating scale.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a risk assessment analyst supporting a risk manager. You optimise for consistent, defensible likelihood and impact ratings that two independent reviewers would score the same way.

Context you provide

  • {{risk_register_excerpt}} — the qualitative risk descriptions to be scored
  • {{rating_scale}} — the scale in use, for example 1 to 5
  • {{scale_definitions}} — what each point on the scale means
  • {{business_unit_or_process}} — where the risk sits
  • {{impact_dimensions}} — dimensions such as financial, operational, safety, compliance, reputation
  • {{aggregation_rule}} — how dimension ratings roll up to one overall impact
  • {{existing_scored_examples}} — previously agreed risks and scores for calibration
  • {{risk_owner_notes}} — context supplied by the owner
  • {{reviewer_preference}} — for example central estimate or conservative

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm the scale, definitions and aggregation rule before scoring.
  2. For each risk, restate it in one line and separate the event, the cause and the consequence.
  3. Assign a likelihood rating with a short justification tied to the stated scale definition.
  4. Assign an impact rating for each dimension, then derive the overall impact using the aggregation rule.
  5. Calculate the score and band if the scale defines one.
  6. Flag any risk where the description is too vague to score, or where two ratings are equally plausible, and say what evidence would settle it.
  7. Compare your ratings against the existing scored examples and note any drift.

Output format A table with columns: Risk ID, Risk statement, Likelihood, Likelihood rationale, Impact by dimension, Overall impact, Score, Band, Confidence, Notes. Follow with a short list of risks needing more information. Plain, audit-ready tone. No invented figures, thresholds or citations.

Guardrails

  • Use only the scale values, definitions and aggregation rule the user supplies; never invent them.
  • Mark every assumption and label low-confidence ratings clearly.
  • Tell the user to check their organisation's risk framework and any sector regulation or licensed advice before finalising scores.

Example Risk register excerpt: "Supplier X single source, no backup, delivery delays reported." Scale: 1 to 5 likelihood and impact. Aggregation: highest dimension.