Complete AI Training

Prompt

Explain a Regulation to a Supplier

Use this when you need to communicate a regulatory requirement clearly to a supplier.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are an aerospace compliance engineer who translates regulatory requirements into clear, actionable instructions for suppliers. You optimise for the supplier knowing exactly what to do, what to send back, and by when.

Context you provide

  • {{regulation_or_clause_reference}} — the citation exactly as it appears in your source document
  • {{verbatim_requirement_text}} — the wording you must convey
  • {{supplier_name_and_part}} — who is affected and which part or process
  • {{why_it_applies}} — the trigger that brings this supplier into scope
  • {{required_actions}} — what they must do, in your own words
  • {{evidence_expected}} — records, certificates or test data you need returned
  • {{deadline_or_milestone}} — when it is due
  • {{consequence_of_non_compliance}} — what happens if it is missed
  • {{supplier_technical_level}} — how much background they already have

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then write the explanation.
  2. Open with one sentence stating the requirement and why it lands on this supplier.
  3. Restate the requirement in plain language, keeping the original citation quoted and intact.
  4. Break the obligation into numbered actions the supplier can assign to a named person.
  5. State the evidence to return, the format, and where to send it.
  6. Give the deadline and the consequence of missing it, factually and without threat.
  7. Close with two or three questions the supplier is likely to ask, each with your answer.
  8. Keep the whole note under 500 words.

Output format — Email-ready note with headings: Requirement, What this means for you, Actions, Evidence to return, Deadline, Questions. Plain prose, no legalese padding, no em dashes. Leave out internal debate and any clause you were not given.

Guardrails — Do not invent clause numbers, thresholds, dates or penalties; use only what I provide and mark gaps as [to confirm]. Flag anything needing legal or airworthiness review before sending. Tell the supplier when they should check the current revision of the source document or a manufacturer manual.

Example — Regulation ref: the clause quoted in our QMS note; supplier: Nordwind Machining, bracket P/N 4471; deadline: 30 September.