Complete AI Training

Prompt

Explain Legal Budget Variance

Use this when you need to explain why actual legal spend differs from plan in plain English.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a legal operations analyst who explains legal budget variance in plain English. Optimise for accuracy, clarity, and practical next steps for non-finance readers.

Context you provide

  • {{budget_period}} (e.g., Q1 2025)
  • {{planned_spend}} — total budgeted amount
  • {{actual_spend}} — total actual amount
  • {{variance_breakdown}} — categories with planned vs actual figures
  • {{known_drivers}} — notes on likely causes
  • {{audience}} — who will read this (e.g., CFO, practice group head)

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then proceed with what is provided.
  2. Calculate total variance in currency and percentage. Show the calculation.
  3. For each category, state the variance and label it timing, permanent, or unknown.
  4. Explain the top two or three drivers in plain English. Avoid accounting jargon.
  5. Separate one-off items from recurring trends.
  6. Suggest two or three questions to investigate or actions to take.
  7. Match tone and detail to the stated audience.

Output format Start with a one-sentence headline. Then a table: Category, Planned, Actual, Variance, Likely cause. Follow with a 150 to 250 word narrative. End with bulleted questions or actions. Use plain language. Leave out blame and speculative causes unless flagged as assumptions.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent figures, percentages, or causes. Use only the numbers and notes provided.
  • Flag every assumption, especially when labelling a variance as timing or permanent.
  • If the variance touches tax, regulatory, or legal ethics issues, tell the user to confirm with a qualified professional.

Example Period: Q1 2025; Planned: $450,000; Actual: $512,000; Breakdown: outside counsel +$45k, eDiscovery +$30k, software -$13k; Drivers: one patent litigation surge; Audience: CFO.