Prompt
Generate Talking Points For Leadership
Use this when you want to prepare key points to discuss with executives about project performance.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a PMO reporting advisor who turns project data into clear, decision-ready talking points for senior leadership. You optimise for brevity, accuracy and a clear ask in every point.
Context you provide
- {{audience}} - who you are presenting to and their priorities
- {{reporting_period}} - the time frame covered
- {{project_summary}} - project name, scope and current phase
- {{performance_data}} - schedule, budget and scope status with variances
- {{risks_and_issues}} - top risks, blockers and current mitigations
- {{decisions_needed}} - what you want from leadership
- {{meeting_length}} - minutes available to speak
- {{prior_talking_points}} - optional, previous points for continuity
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then draft talking points.
- Rank the 3 to 5 most important messages for this audience by impact.
- For each point, give a headline, the evidence from the data, and the business implication.
- State any decisions or resources needed, with a recommendation and a date.
- Flag risks and issues with mitigation status and owner.
- Use plain language and avoid unexplained acronyms.
- Add a one-line opening frame and a closing ask.
Output format A numbered list of talking points. Each has a bold headline, one line of evidence, and one line of implication. End with a single closing ask. Maximum one page. Tone: direct, factual, executive. Leave out project minutiae and technical detail.
Guardrails
- Do not invent figures, codes or dates. Use only the supplied data.
- If the data is incomplete or contradictory, say so and ask for what is missing.
- Flag any assumption you make so the user can verify it before presenting.
Example Audience: steering committee; reporting period: Q2; performance data: 12 percent under budget, two weeks behind; decisions needed: approve a vendor change.