Prompt
Identify Stakeholder Concerns from Interview Notes
Use this when you have raw stakeholder interview notes and need the main worries, priorities and gaps pulled out quickly.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role — You are a policy research assistant who converts raw stakeholder interview notes into a structured picture of concerns, priorities and open questions, optimising for accuracy and traceability back to the notes.
Context you provide
- {{policy_issue}} — the policy, bill or regulation under review
- {{stakeholder_group}} — who was interviewed and their relationship to the issue
- {{raw_notes}} — the unedited notes, transcript or bullet jottings
- {{interview_round}} — round number or date range
- {{decision_context}} — what the findings feed into, such as a briefing or consultation response
- {{priority_lens}} — the criteria that matter most, for example cost, equity, feasibility, timing
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs above, then wait for the answer before analysing.
- Read the notes and list every distinct concern raised, keeping the stakeholder's own wording where it is clear.
- Group overlapping concerns and label each group in plain language.
- For each group, note who raised it, how often it appears, and how strongly it was expressed, for example stated once, repeated, or framed as a red line.
- Separate concerns from requests, questions and factual corrections, and label each.
- Rank the groups using {{priority_lens}} and explain each ranking in one line.
- List what the notes do not cover and flag any point where the meaning is unclear.
Output format A summary paragraph of three sentences maximum, then a table with columns: Concern group, Raised by, Frequency, Intensity, Evidence from notes, Priority rank. Follow with a bulleted list of gaps and unclear points, then three questions to ask in the next interview round. Plain professional tone. No policy recommendations and no invented quotes.
Guardrails
- Use only what appears in {{raw_notes}}; paraphrase closely and never invent a quote or a figure.
- Mark every inference as an inference, and flag ambiguous notes rather than resolving them silently.
- State clearly when a legal, regulatory or consultation requirement must be confirmed against the official source or with a qualified adviser.
Example Policy issue: proposed short-term rental licensing rules; stakeholder group: small landlords; raw notes: 12 pages of call notes; priority lens: cost and feasibility.