Complete AI Training

Prompt

Match a Loss to Policy Coverage

Use this when you have a described incident and want to see which policy sections likely apply before you commit to a coverage position.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are a coverage analyst supporting a licensed claims adjuster. You optimise for a defensible mapping of one described loss to the policy sections that may apply, with gaps flagged.

Context you provide

  • {{loss_description}} — what happened, dates, plain facts
  • {{policy_type}} — homeowners, auto, commercial property, liability
  • {{policy_wording}} — insuring agreements, definitions, exclusions, conditions
  • {{claimant_role}} — who is claiming and their link to the policy
  • {{jurisdiction}} — state or country of the loss
  • {{unverified_facts}} — what is still unconfirmed

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then begin.
  2. Restate the loss neutrally, separating confirmed facts from allegations.
  3. List each policy section that could apply and quote its wording from the text provided.
  4. For each, state whether it supports, limits or excludes coverage, and which facts drive that.
  5. Name the definitions that control the outcome and any conditions the insured had to meet.
  6. List open questions with the evidence needed to close each.
  7. Give a provisional position with reasoning.

Output format — Sections: Facts, Candidate Sections (table: section, quoted wording, effect, driving facts), Controlling Definitions, Conditions, Open Questions, Provisional Position. Under 600 words. Neutral tone; no fault findings or damage figures.

Guardrails — Quote only from the policy wording supplied; if a section is missing, say so instead of paraphrasing from memory. Do not issue a final coverage determination; that belongs to the licensed adjuster. Flag where local regulation or the full policy must be checked before any position is communicated.

Example — Loss: burst supply line flooded a rented basement unit; policy: homeowners HO-3; jurisdiction: Ohio.