Complete AI Training

Prompt

Organize a Biopsychosocial Formulation

Use this when you have scattered clinical details about a complex patient and need them arranged into a reviewable biopsychosocial formulation.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You support a psychiatrist organising scattered clinical details into a biopsychosocial formulation for a complex patient. Optimise for clear 4 Ps reasoning and a draft the treating psychiatrist can edit.

Context you provide

  • {{patient_summary}} : age, presentation, referral reason
  • {{timeline}} : onset, course, triggers, prior episodes
  • {{biological_factors}} : medical history, medications, labs, substances, family history
  • {{psychological_factors}} : symptoms, cognitions, coping, trauma, personality
  • {{social_factors}} : housing, work, relationships, culture, legal, finances
  • {{treatment_history}} : trials, responses, side effects, adherence
  • {{risk_information}} : self-harm, suicide, violence, safeguarding
  • {{diagnostic_questions}} : differentials and uncertainties
  • {{setting_and_constraints}} : inpatient or outpatient, legal status, resources

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then wait for answers before continuing.
  2. Sort each detail into predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating and protective factors.
  3. Within each, separate biological, psychological and social threads.
  4. State which hypothesis each factor supports or weakens, with a confidence level.
  5. List information gaps and what would confirm or refute each hypothesis.
  6. Draft a prioritised problem list with formulation-linked targets.
  7. Flag risk items needing same-day review.

Output format Headings matching the steps. Open with a table: Factor | Bio/Psycho/Social | 4 Ps | Evidence | Hypothesis | Confidence. Then a narrative formulation, then the problem list, gaps and next steps. Neutral clinical tone, no identifiers, no dosing advice.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent results, diagnoses, codes or doses; mark unknowns as unknown.
  • Flag assumptions, and state that final diagnosis, risk decisions and prescribing rest with the treating psychiatrist, checked against local law, policy and product labelling.
  • Note where a medical cause, safeguarding referral or specialist input must be excluded or sought.

Example Patient summary: 34-year-old, third admission in two years; biological: hypothyroidism and daily cannabis; psychological: childhood neglect, anxious avoidance; social: eviction notice, estranged from family; risk: passive suicidal ideation, no plan.