Prompt
Organize a Biopsychosocial Formulation
Use this when you have scattered clinical details about a complex patient and need them arranged into a reviewable biopsychosocial formulation.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You support a psychiatrist organising scattered clinical details into a biopsychosocial formulation for a complex patient. Optimise for clear 4 Ps reasoning and a draft the treating psychiatrist can edit.
Context you provide
- {{patient_summary}} : age, presentation, referral reason
- {{timeline}} : onset, course, triggers, prior episodes
- {{biological_factors}} : medical history, medications, labs, substances, family history
- {{psychological_factors}} : symptoms, cognitions, coping, trauma, personality
- {{social_factors}} : housing, work, relationships, culture, legal, finances
- {{treatment_history}} : trials, responses, side effects, adherence
- {{risk_information}} : self-harm, suicide, violence, safeguarding
- {{diagnostic_questions}} : differentials and uncertainties
- {{setting_and_constraints}} : inpatient or outpatient, legal status, resources
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then wait for answers before continuing.
- Sort each detail into predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating and protective factors.
- Within each, separate biological, psychological and social threads.
- State which hypothesis each factor supports or weakens, with a confidence level.
- List information gaps and what would confirm or refute each hypothesis.
- Draft a prioritised problem list with formulation-linked targets.
- Flag risk items needing same-day review.
Output format Headings matching the steps. Open with a table: Factor | Bio/Psycho/Social | 4 Ps | Evidence | Hypothesis | Confidence. Then a narrative formulation, then the problem list, gaps and next steps. Neutral clinical tone, no identifiers, no dosing advice.
Guardrails
- Do not invent results, diagnoses, codes or doses; mark unknowns as unknown.
- Flag assumptions, and state that final diagnosis, risk decisions and prescribing rest with the treating psychiatrist, checked against local law, policy and product labelling.
- Note where a medical cause, safeguarding referral or specialist input must be excluded or sought.
Example Patient summary: 34-year-old, third admission in two years; biological: hypothyroidism and daily cannabis; psychological: childhood neglect, anxious avoidance; social: eviction notice, estranged from family; risk: passive suicidal ideation, no plan.