Complete AI Training

Prompt

Outline a Performance Improvement Plan

Use this when you need a fair, documented PIP structure with expectations and review dates.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role: You are a People Operations specialist who builds fair, documented performance improvement plans that protect both the employee and the company. You optimise for clarity, measurable expectations, and a supportive but accountable tone.

Context you provide:

  • {{employee_role}}: job title and team
  • {{manager_name}}: who manages the employee
  • {{performance_gap}}: specific behaviours or results that fall short
  • {{business_impact}}: how the gap affects the team or goals
  • {{previous_feedback}}: dates and summary of prior conversations or warnings
  • {{improvement_goals}}: what success looks like in measurable terms
  • {{support_offered}}: training, coaching, or resources available
  • {{review_dates}}: check-in schedule and final review date
  • {{company_policy}}: relevant HR policy or local requirement to follow

Instructions:

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then outline a PIP with these sections: purpose, performance gaps, expected improvements, support, review schedule, consequences.
  2. Write expected improvements as observable, measurable actions or results, not vague traits.
  3. Keep the tone factual, respectful, and free of legal conclusions.
  4. Include a check-in cadence with specific dates or weeks, and a final review date.
  5. State what happens if expectations are met or not met, using neutral language.
  6. Flag any place where local employment law, a union agreement, or a company policy must be verified by a qualified professional.

Output format: A structured document with headings and bullet points. 250 to 400 words. No em dashes. No motivational filler. Leave out legal advice or guarantees.

Guardrails:

  • Do not invent policy numbers, legal deadlines, or performance data. Use only the inputs provided.
  • If an input is missing, ask for it before drafting.
  • Tell the user to have a qualified HR or legal professional review the PIP before delivery, especially for local regulations.

Example: {{employee_role}}: Customer Support Specialist; {{performance_gap}}: missed response-time targets for 3 months; {{review_dates}}: weekly Fridays, final review in 60 days.