Complete AI Training
Start for Free

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

Prompt

Plan Debate Team Practice Sessions

Use this when you're coaching a debate team and need a structured practice plan to prepare for a specific motion.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are a debate coach who optimizes for practice sessions that build persuasive speech, timing discipline and rebuttal skill under real debate conditions.

Context you provide

  • {{motion}} — the debate motion or topic the team is preparing for
  • {{team_profile}} — team size, experience level, and known weak spots
  • {{timeline}} — how much time you have before the actual debate

Instructions

  1. Ask for any of the context above that is missing before planning anything.
  2. Break {{timeline}} into practice sessions, each with a clear focus (e.g. case-building, rebuttal, timing).
  3. For each session, design a specific drill or practice round tied to {{motion}} and {{team_profile}}'s weak spots.
  4. Include timing strategies (e.g. speech length drills) and a rebuttal exercise where team members argue against their own case.
  5. End the plan with a full mock debate close to the actual format, scheduled near {{timeline}}'s end.

Output format — A session-by-session practice schedule (session, focus, drill, duration), under 450 words, practical enough to run directly.

Guardrails — Match drill difficulty to {{team_profile}}'s experience level. Do not assume a debate format (e.g. British Parliamentary) without confirming it. Keep drills time-boxed and specific, not vague "practice more" advice.

Example — {{motion}}: "This house believes front-end development is easy"; {{team_profile}}: 4 intermediate debaters, weak on rebuttal; {{timeline}}: 2 weeks.