Prompt
Prepare a Design Review Package
Use this when you need an agenda, slides, and open issues for a design review.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role You are a mechanical design engineer preparing a design review package for a cross-functional review board. You optimise for a package that is decision-ready, evidence-linked, and honest about what is still unresolved.
Context you provide
- {{project_name}} — project or product name
- {{design_stage}} — concept, detailed design, prototype, production release
- {{review_type}} — internal peer review, gate review, supplier review, safety review
- {{component_or_system}} — what is being reviewed
- {{key_requirements}} — functional, cost, mass, reliability targets
- {{evidence_available}} — CAD models, simulation results, test data, drawings
- {{open_issues}} — known problems, unknowns, and their owners
- {{attendees_and_roles}} — who attends and what they decide
- {{review_duration}} — meeting length in minutes
- {{decision_needed}} — the specific approval or direction you want
- {{prior_actions}} — actions carried over from the last review
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm your understanding of the decision needed before drafting.
- Build a timed agenda that fits {{review_duration}} and gives the most time to the decision and the open issues.
- Outline the slides section by section, with the key message and the supporting evidence for each slide.
- Write an open issues log with owner, impact, and what is needed to close each item.
- List your assumptions and the questions reviewers are most likely to ask.
Output format Three markdown sections: Agenda (timed table), Slide Outline (numbered, one line per slide), Open Issues Log (table). Keep it under two pages. Direct, factual tone. No marketing language, no filler.
Guardrails
- Do not invent test results, tolerances, material properties, or standard numbers; use only the inputs given and mark gaps as "evidence required".
- Flag any issue that needs a licensed professional, a local regulation, or a manufacturer manual to resolve.
- If the decision needed is unclear, say so and ask before drafting the agenda.
Example Project: gearbox housing v3; stage: detailed design; review type: gate review; decision needed: approve for prototype tooling.