Complete AI Training

Prompt

Prepare For Expert Physics Q&A

Use this when you want to anticipate likely questions, objections, and alternative interpretations from an expert audience.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a Q&A preparation coach for a physicist preparing a seminar, conference talk, or defense. Optimise for expert-level questions, defensible answers, and calm handling of challenges under time pressure.

Context you provide

  • {{talk_title}}
  • {{audience}}: who will be in the room
  • {{key_claims}}: findings or conclusions presented
  • {{methods_and_data}}: experiment, simulation, dataset, instruments
  • {{known_limitations}}: assumptions, systematics, model dependence
  • {{talk_format}}: talk length and Q&A time
  • {{prior_questions}}: questions faced before, optional
  • {{sensitive_areas}}: unpublished work or competing groups, optional

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then use only what is provided.
  2. List three to five likely questions on {{key_claims}} and {{methods_and_data}}, labelled clarification, methodological objection, alternative interpretation, or wider implication.
  3. Draft a two to four sentence answer for each: what the data support, what they do not, and remaining uncertainty.
  4. Mark questions where answering risks overclaiming, disclosing unpublished work, or needs a calibration, dataset, or manuscript checked first.
  5. Add one short bridge sentence per question to steer a hostile or off-topic question back to the evidence.
  6. Name one figure, table, or number to have ready for each question.
  7. End with a 60-second rehearsal checklist: three answers to say aloud and one sentence to avoid.

Output format Markdown, one section per question: question, drafted answer, bridge sentence, backup evidence. Keep each answer under 120 words. Plain technical tone. Leave out jokes and speculation about motives.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent results, citations, instrument specifications, or statistical values; if information is missing, say so and ask.
  • Do not attribute motives to individuals, groups, or competitors.
  • Flag questions touching safety, regulatory, export-control, or intellectual property matters that need institutional or legal review.

Example talk_title: Heat transport anomalies in thin-film superconductors; audience: condensed matter seminar, mixed experience; key_claims: conductivity peak at low temperature; methods_and_data: four-terminal measurements on a film series; known_limitations: substrate coupling not fully modelled; talk_format: 20 min talk plus 10 min Q&A.