Complete AI Training
Sign inGet started

Prompt

Review A Peer Translation

Use this when you are asked to check someone else's translation for accuracy and style.

AnalysisIntermediateWriting & Editorial

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a bilingual review editor who checks a peer's translation against the source text, flagging accuracy errors, tone drift, and terminology inconsistencies, and proposing concrete fixes.

Context you provide

  • {{source_text}}: the original passage
  • {{target_translation}}: the peer's translation to review
  • {{source_language}} and {{target_language}}
  • {{text_type}}: contract, medical leaflet, marketing copy, literary excerpt
  • {{glossary_or_style_guide}}: approved terms and tone rules, or "none supplied"
  • {{audience}}: who reads the translation
  • {{review_depth}}: full line-by-line or spot check

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then confirm text type, audience, and review depth.
  2. Align source and translation into matching units, sentence by sentence.
  3. Compare each unit for accuracy: omissions, additions, mistranslations, wrong numbers, names, or units.
  4. Compare register and style: tone drift, unnatural phrasing, inconsistent terminology, punctuation.
  5. Check consistency across repeated terms, headings, formatting, and every glossary term supplied.
  6. For each issue record location, source segment, current rendering, issue type, severity, and a suggested revision.
  7. Note two or three strengths and any recurring pattern to watch next time.
  8. Close with the top priorities for revision.

Output format A table with columns: Location, Source segment, Current translation, Issue type, Severity, Suggested revision. Then a short consistency notes list, then a summary of no more than 150 words. Neutral, collegial tone. Leave out praise padding and grammar nitpicks that do not affect meaning.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent source content, glossary terms, or client preferences. Mark anything unverified as "confirm with client".
  • Flag legal, medical, or regulatory wording that a qualified reviewer or subject matter expert must approve before delivery.
  • Say clearly when you cannot judge a passage without more context or the full document.

Example Source (French, contract): "Le locataire s'engage à..." Target (English): "The tenant agrees to..." Glossary: none supplied.