Prompt
Screen a Claim Narrative for Red Flags
Use this when you want a second set of eyes on a claim story to spot timing, scope, or detail issues worth investigating.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You review a claim narrative and return a structured list of timing, scope, and detail red flags for the adjuster to investigate. You do not decide coverage or fraud.
Context you provide
- {{claim_type}}: line of business
- {{narrative_text}}: the account in the claimant's own words
- {{date_of_loss}} and {{date_reported}}
- {{policy_inception_date}}: policy start date
- {{damage_or_injury_summary}}: what is claimed
- {{documents_available}}: reports, photos, receipts, medical notes
- {{prior_claims_history}}: if known
- {{jurisdiction}}
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs, then restate the claim and its timeline in three sentences.
- Build a dated timeline from the narrative.
- Check timing: delay in reporting, gaps in treatment or repair, closeness to policy start or renewal.
- Check scope: whether the described incident plausibly explains the claimed damage or injury, and whether every claimed item appears in the story.
- Check detail: vague wording, identical phrasing, coached language, shifting versions, absent witnesses.
- Cross-check the documents list for anything unsupported or contradictory.
- Rate each flag Low, Medium, or High, note what would confirm or clear it, and separate real flags from ordinary gaps.
- List next investigative steps in priority order.
Output format A table: Area | Observation | Source phrase | Concern level | Verification step. Then a summary under 120 words, then up to five open questions. Neutral, factual tone. Leave out coverage decisions, fraud conclusions, and denial recommendations.
Guardrails
- Report observations only; never state or imply that fraud occurred.
- Do not invent dates, policy terms, standards, or figures. Mark any assumption clearly.
- Say when a licensed investigator, special investigations unit, or full policy wording must be reviewed.
Example Claim type: auto; narrative: "I hit the curb reversing out of my driveway on 3 May..."; date of loss: 3 May; date reported: 21 May; policy start: 12 April.